PDA

View Full Version : Post New Wegene Results



Modernancientdna
02-24-2018, 05:24 PM
My results, I don't know if that is correct regions from google translate? Or no

Modernancientdna
02-24-2018, 05:36 PM
What is Cuban dry reference?

SWAHILLI_PRINCE16
02-24-2018, 06:31 PM
Deleted

SWAHILLI_PRINCE16
02-24-2018, 06:45 PM
My dads results

West Africa 53.244%
Kuhtun 9.959% Ethnic
Nile Basin 9.519%
Eastern Safari of Eastern Africa 8.662%
Safari of Central Africa 7.949%
Safari of Southern Africa 2.634 %
North Africa 2.121%
Tibetan-Myanmar Survivor 1.677%
Sahrawi 1.646%
Omah 1.166%
Arabs 0.867%
Southern Caucasians 0.321%
Papians 0.200%
Mediterranean 0.001%
Pamirs 0.001%
Eastern Mediterranean 0.001%
Southern Chinese 0.001%
Central American Indians 0.001%
Males 0.001%
Baltic 0.001%
Amazon 0.001%
Iranian 0.001%
Nordic 0.001%
Tungus Ethnic 0.001%
East Asia 0.001%
Northwest Indians 0.001%
Ural 0.001%
Western Finland 0.001%
Celtic 0.001%
North Sea German 0.001%
Siberian 0.001%
Mongolian 0.001%
Chuvash 0.001%
Northeast Asia 0.001%
South Indians 0.001%
Indochina 0.001%
Andean 0.001%
Eastern Europe 0.001%
North American Indians 0.001%
Monda Minority 0.001%
Eastern Mediterranean 0.001 %
Original Austronesian population 0.001%
Altai 0.001%
Old Balkans 0.001%
North Caucasian 0.001%
Eastern Iberian 0.001%
Northern Iberian 0.001%

Modernancientdna
02-24-2018, 07:04 PM
What do these results even mean??

Your second results is align with your signature results, more than first.

I use google translate my regions is different maybe I made error chinese to english?

Modernancientdna
02-24-2018, 07:09 PM
I use Ancestry data

firemonkey
02-24-2018, 09:05 PM
21732

BalkanKiwi
02-24-2018, 10:15 PM
What section would one find these updates? I still have the original results on both the English and Chinese sites. Unless you have to upload new data?

Varun R
02-24-2018, 11:01 PM
It's posted under the third party interpretation section.

Censored
02-25-2018, 12:20 AM
It's posted under the third party interpretation section.

What is the exact name?

Censored
02-25-2018, 12:28 AM
South Indian 29.672%
Mundari ethnic 21.028%
Northwest Indians 11.844%
North Caucasian 11.270%
of Iranians 10.750%
Pamir people 8.482%
South Caucasian 2.873%
Papuans 1.291%
Amazons 0.733%
Redskins 0.589%
Tibeto-Burman Ethnic groups 0.484%
Omar ethnic 0.430%
Sahil 0.221%
Chuvash 0.123%
Central African Safari 0.107% Ethnic
Nile Valley 0.073%

"Central African Safari"

The fuck

BalkanKiwi
02-25-2018, 12:51 AM
It's posted under the third party interpretation section.

Ah, I saw "Pro" and didn't bother clicking it, thinking it was a paid third party test. Thanks my friend.

North Sea German 16.567%
Eastern Europe 14.069%
Celtic 10.220%
Nordic 8.908%
Western Finland 8.082%
Baltic 8.075%
Eastern Iberian 8.019%
Eastern Mediterranean 4.678%
Northern Iberian 4.434%
Old Balkan 4.313%
South Caucasian 3.444%
Mediterranean 3.354%
North Caucasian 1.953%
Western Mediterranean 1.686%
Pamir 1.269%
Papua 0.499%
North Africa 0.400%

Aldric
02-25-2018, 12:54 AM
Celtic 17.639%
North Sea German 13.782%
Eastern Europe 12.559%
Nordic ethnic group 11.903%
East Iberian 8.884%
Northern Iberian 7.583%
Mediterranean 6.142%
Western Finland 5.176%
Western Mediterranean 3.748%
Baltic Sea 3.512%
North Caucasian 2.215%
Pamirs 1.739%
Ancient Balkan 1.525%
Eastern Mediterranean 1.190%
Chuvash 0.926%
Iranian 0.750%
North Africa 0.698%

kush
02-25-2018, 12:59 AM
South Indian 33.575%
Monadian ethnic group 18.433%
Iranian 15.263%
Northwest Indian 13.442%
Pamir 6.801%
North Caucasian 5.283%
South Caucasian 3.516%
Tibetan-Myanmar population 2.067%
Papua 0.862%
West Africa 0.375%
Southern Africa Tour Hunter 0.348%

MonkeyDLuffy
02-25-2018, 01:05 AM
Lol this is Lukaz 47 calculator. Did he upload it?

kush
02-25-2018, 01:14 AM
Lol this is Lukaz 47 calculator. Did he upload it?

yes it is lukaz's calc. not sure if he put it on wegene though lol. It shows 'yaoxt' as the uploader.

Censored
02-25-2018, 01:20 AM
South Indian 33.575%
Monadian ethnic group 18.433%
Iranian 15.263%
Northwest Indian 13.442%
Pamir 6.801%
North Caucasian 5.283%
South Caucasian 3.516%
Tibetan-Myanmar population 2.067%
Papua 0.862%
West Africa 0.375%
Southern Africa Tour Hunter 0.348%

How do you have much higher Iranian while I have much higher North Caucasian?

MonkeyDLuffy
02-25-2018, 01:28 AM
South Indians 21.523%
North Caucasian 12.511%
Iranians 12.111%
Pamirs 11.615%
Northwest Indians 11.314%
Monda Minorities 10.702%
Southern Caucasians 6.384 %
Eastern Europe 4.408%
Ural Ethnic 2.856%
Baltic 2.338%
Chuvash 0.913%
North Sea Germans 0.868%
Chinese and American Indians 0.782%
North American Indians 0.714%
Papians 0.433%
Ethnic Nile Watersheds 0.194%
Omoros 0.129%
Celts 0.124%
Amazonians 0.052%
Mediterranean 0.001%
Western Mediterranean 0.001 %
Chinese Southerners 0.001%
Malays 0.001%
Southern African Safari 0.001%
Northern European 0.001%
Tungus Ethnic 0.001%
East Asia 0.001%
Eastern Africa Safari 0.001%
Sahrawi 0.001%
Western Finland 0.001%
West Africa 0.001%
Siberian 0.001%
Mongolian 0.001%
Northeast Asia 0.001%
Indochina 0.001%
Andean 0.001%
Central Africa Safari 0.001%
Arab 0.001%
Eastern Mediterranean 0.001%
Original Austronesian 0.001%
Altai 0.001%
Old Balkans 0.001%
North Africa 0.001%
Tibetan-Burma 0.001%
Eastern Iberians 0.001%
Northern Iberians 0.001%
Khulta 0.001%

kush
02-25-2018, 01:53 AM
How do you have much higher Iranian while I have much higher North Caucasian?

Iranian on this calc is iran neolithic or baloch/gedrosian type component. I usually get slightly higher gedrosian on many calculators so thats most likely why. The north caucasian is the actual caucasus component. I remember you scored almost 8% caucasian on harappa, so thats probably why your north caucasian is quite high.

Censored
02-25-2018, 01:59 AM
Iranian on this calc is iran neolithic or baloch/gedrosian type component. I usually get slightly higher gedrosian on many calculators so thats most likely why. The north caucasian is the actual caucasus component. I remember you scored almost 8% caucasian on harappa, so thats probably why your north caucasian is quite high.

Yes I remember your results now, you had quite a bit more Baloch than I do. What would cause you to have more Gedrosia type DNA than I do considering we are from the same area? Caucasian, I can understand as some groups have higher steppe ancestry but Iran-neolithic/Baloch component should be similar for us, no?

vettor
02-25-2018, 02:21 AM
Western Mediterranean 12.612%
Eastern Europe 11.867%
North Sea German 10.756%
Celtic 9.949%
Northern Iberian 7.738%
Mediterranean 6.656%
Nordic ethnic group 6.439%
Ancient Balkans 6.234%
Eastern Mediterranean 5.935%
South Caucasian 5.351%
East Iberian 4.634%
Iranian 4.526%
Baltic Sea 2.665%
Arabs 2.350%
Chuvash 1.075%
North Africa 0.819%
Pamir 0.352%
Western Finland 0.013%

kush
02-25-2018, 02:24 AM
Yes I remember your results now, you had quite a bit more Baloch than I do. What would cause you to have more Gedrosia type DNA than I do considering we are from the same area? Caucasian, I can understand as some groups have higher steppe ancestry but Iran-neolithic/Baloch component should be similar for us, no?

I think dravidian mid castes tend to score SLIGHTLY higher baloch than other castes from the region, but the difference is negligible imo. Honestly the baloch component has no cline since it's 34% in afghan pashtuns and in tamils. Your baloch might be a little low cause you have quite high caucasian and euro which suggests a little admixture from the north or somewhere outside and those components are offsetting the baloch component by a bit. I dont think you have any low caste origin since your south indian is lower than mine which means either you have slight admixture, or some of your baloch is spilling into the caucasian component. I still think admixture though because most south indians, other than brahmins, dont score ANY NE euro component.

If you dont mind can you share your gedmatch kit #? Thanks

MonkeyDLuffy
02-25-2018, 02:32 AM
I think dravidian mid castes tend to score SLIGHTLY higher baloch than other castes from the region, but the difference is negligible imo. Honestly the baloch component has no cline since it's 34% in afghan pashtuns and in tamils. Your baloch might be a little low cause you have quite high caucasian and euro which suggests a little admixture from the north or somewhere outside and those components are offsetting the baloch component by a bit. I dont think you have any low caste origin since your south indian is lower than mine which means either you have slight admixture, or some of your baloch is spilling into the caucasian component. I still think admixture though because most south indians, other than brahmins, dont score ANY NE euro component.

No he scores higher Munda/SE asian kind than you which balance it out. Which means he has more Indian tribal affinity in comparison to you. Caucasian is CHG splitting into components. You guys can compare CHG with each other. To me it seems like one side of his family is Brahmin in origin who usually carry more steppe among south Indians, while other is more tribal indian like.

kush
02-25-2018, 02:44 AM
No he scores higher Munda/SE asian kind than you which balance it out. Which means he has more Indian tribal affinity in comparison to you. Caucasian is CHG splitting into components. You guys can compare CHG with each other. To me it seems like one side of his family is Brahmin in origin who usually carry more steppe among south Indians, while other is more tribal indian like.

yeah what you said makes sense since he does have more munda than me but also higher steppe. Idk though his caucasian component on harappa is still confusing me. He gets 7.5% which is higher than all castes in south india including brahmins.

Censored
02-25-2018, 03:01 AM
yeah what you said makes sense since he does have more munda than me but also higher steppe. Idk though his caucasian component on harappa is still confusing me. He gets 7.5% which is higher than all castes in south india including brahmins.

The way I see it, that Brahmin that Monkey is referring to is more likely partial Pashtun ancestry from my paternal grandfather. It makes sense considering phenotype and also if I was only half Brahmin the component would be lower than what it is. I may be wrong about this but I can send you photos of that part of the family if you're interested.

MonkeyDLuffy
02-25-2018, 03:10 AM
I simply don't understand why phenotype is brought to prove genetics. A haryana jatt can look like a Bihari but is one of the least SA genetically. I can post lots of family members who range from looking Persian to straight Slav. Does not mean I have such ancestry.

bmoney
02-25-2018, 03:11 AM
I think dravidian mid castes tend to score SLIGHTLY higher baloch than other castes from the region, but the difference is negligible imo. Honestly the baloch component has no cline since it's 34% in afghan pashtuns and in tamils. Your baloch might be a little low cause you have quite high caucasian and euro which suggests a little admixture from the north or somewhere outside and those components are offsetting the baloch component by a bit. I dont think you have any low caste origin since your south indian is lower than mine which means either you have slight admixture, or some of your baloch is spilling into the caucasian component. I still think admixture though because most south indians, other than brahmins, dont score ANY NE euro component.

If you dont mind can you share your gedmatch kit #? Thanks

There is a cline, its generally lower in the south and east and highest in West and NW India

lilac9
02-25-2018, 03:12 AM
Where is this on Wegene? I looked where it said Pocket DNA couldn't find it!

bmoney
02-25-2018, 03:14 AM
yeah what you said makes sense since he does have more munda than me but also higher steppe. Idk though his caucasian component on harappa is still confusing me. He gets 7.5% which is higher than all castes in south india including brahmins.

Mine is 7.56%, I would assume Tulu Bunts would score higher - so its not particularly high

Maybe its high for Hyderabad

Also non-Brahmin South Indians do score NE Euro but limited to certain castes and communities

Some Christians from Kerala score NE Euro too

MonkeyDLuffy
02-25-2018, 03:17 AM
Where is this on Wegene? I looked where it said Pocket DNA couldn't find it!

Check out the Chinese website, you can use google translate. Then click on my ancestry and there you will find third party.

https://i.imgur.com/uevNwYN.png

https://i.imgur.com/r8B1f9O.png?1

https://i.imgur.com/iXxI4lx.png

lilac9
02-25-2018, 03:18 AM
Ah ok MonkeyDuffy. I thought I was going crazy there because I didn't see that anywhere!

Censored
02-25-2018, 03:20 AM
I think dravidian mid castes tend to score SLIGHTLY higher baloch than other castes from the region, but the difference is negligible imo. Honestly the baloch component has no cline since it's 34% in afghan pashtuns and in tamils. Your baloch might be a little low cause you have quite high caucasian and euro which suggests a little admixture from the north or somewhere outside and those components are offsetting the baloch component by a bit. I dont think you have any low caste origin since your south indian is lower than mine which means either you have slight admixture, or some of your baloch is spilling into the caucasian component. I still think admixture though because most south indians, other than brahmins, dont score ANY NE euro component.

If you dont mind can you share your gedmatch kit #? Thanks

My kit number is M549061

lilac9
02-25-2018, 03:24 AM
How come I can't find it in Chinese anymore? All I get is the English site now. Does anyone know the website address. All I get is this one in English wegene.com/en/

Forget it. I am incredibly dumb tonight.

kush
02-25-2018, 03:25 AM
There is a cline, its generally lower in the south and east and highest in West and NW India

I think pakistanis score in the 40s but most NW indians and gujaratis get around 38-40% and rest of the indians on average get get 35%. Other than in bengalis/NE indians and tribals, it doesn't go lower than 30%. so the range is from 30-40%. It's a 10% difference from west/NW and south/east india but not much of a cline imo. Tamil brahmins, nairs, and Reddys get as much baloch as UP brahmins, punjabi sikhs and gujarati patels. There's more of a cline in NE euro, S.Indian, ASI in the region than in baloch.

Censored
02-25-2018, 03:25 AM
I simply don't understand why phenotype is brought to prove genetics. A haryana jatt can look like a Bihari but is one of the least SA genetically. I can post lots of family members who range from looking Persian to straight Slav. Does not mean I have such ancestry.

I understand what you are trying to say but sometimes it can be a dead giveaway for ancestry from a certain region. For example I am scoring quite high Munda but I could have guessed that would happen because my mother's side show strong Munda features. I know a lot of people love to claim they look like X or Y group, this is especially common among South Asians unfortunately so maybe I'm fighting a losing battle when I try to convince people online using that same argument so I guess I'll stop, lol.

Either way, I'm better off using a parent's DNA for reference and that's what I'm planning to do assuming things go according to plan.

kush
02-25-2018, 03:30 AM
My kit number is M549061

wait is that really your kit number?

I'm getting these results lol

Population
S-Indian -
Baloch 7.48
Caucasian 33.49
NE-Euro 16.68
SE-Asian 0.58
Siberian -
NE-Asian 1.29
Papuan 0.12
American -
Beringian -
Mediterranean 24.31
SW-Asian 13.90
San -
E-African 1.53
Pygmy 0.34
W-African 0.26

lilac9
02-25-2018, 03:33 AM
My result: It's cool but its not aligned properly.
Eastern Iberian
10.187 % Western Mediterranean 9.427%
Northern Iberian 7.956%
Eastern Europe 7.825%
Celtic 7.362%
Mediterranean 6.464%
North Africa 6.142%
Northern European
5.769% Arabs 4.756%
Old Balkans 4.668%
Germanic Beihai 4.491 %
West Africa 4.321%
Andean people 3.924%
Southern Caucasians 3.548%
Amazonians 2.954%
Iranians 2.860%
Central and South American Indians 2.061% The
Sahel 1.792% Chuvashs
1.355%
Baltic 1.026% The
Omar ethnic group 0.736%
West Finns 0.390%

Censored
02-25-2018, 03:33 AM
wait is that really your kit number?

I'm getting these results lol

Population
S-Indian -
Baloch 7.48
Caucasian 33.49
NE-Euro 16.68
SE-Asian 0.58
Siberian -
NE-Asian 1.29
Papuan 0.12
American -
Beringian -
Mediterranean 24.31
SW-Asian 13.90
San -
E-African 1.53
Pygmy 0.34
W-African 0.26

Oh woops, misplaced the 0. It is M540961. Sorry I'm tired right now.

MonkeyDLuffy
02-25-2018, 04:25 AM
I understand what you are trying to say but sometimes it can be a dead giveaway for ancestry from a certain region. For example I am scoring quite high Munda but I could have guessed that would happen because my mother's side show strong Munda features. I know a lot of people love to claim they look like X or Y group, this is especially common among South Asians unfortunately so maybe I'm fighting a losing battle when I try to convince people online using that same argument so I guess I'll stop, lol.

Either way, I'm better off using a parent's DNA for reference and that's what I'm planning to do assuming things go according to plan.

I'd recommend testing parents for sure, or grandparents if possible. A pashtun kind mix is not impossible in hyderabadi muslim or any Indian muslim, it doesn't show in your results probably because it's so diluted. Doesn't mean it's not there.

bmoney
02-25-2018, 04:32 AM
I think pakistanis score in the 40s but most NW indians and gujaratis get around 38-40% and rest of the indians on average get get 35%. Other than in bengalis/NE indians and tribals, it doesn't go lower than 30%. so the range is from 30-40%. It's a 10% difference from west/NW and south/east india but not much of a cline imo. Tamil brahmins, nairs, and Reddys get as much baloch as UP brahmins, punjabi sikhs and gujarati patels. There's more of a cline in NE euro, S.Indian, ASI in the region than in baloch.

When adjusting for pop numbers (caste %) and averages, the cline east and south is there though weak as you mentioned. Its stronger in South Indian castes associated with farming which supports the agriculturalist IVC migration argument

To me the weakness of the cline (though still there) suggests that the component has been in SA for a long time though is strongest at its origin, Gedrosia

Grahamscy
02-25-2018, 05:38 AM
Me :

Celtic 19.175%
North Sea German 16.135%
Nordic ethnic group 15.114%
Northern Iberian 10.526%
Eastern Europe 7.499%
North Caucasian 5.883%
Western Finland 5.577%
East Iberian 4.436%
Mediterranean 4.236%
South Caucasian 4.117%
Baltic Sea 2.265%
Ancient Balkan 1.779%
Ural ethnic group 1.344%
Kuchu language family 0.926%
Chuvash 0.710%
North American Indian 0.227%
Amazon 0.019%

Naturally I cut off all the 0.001 % stuff.Overall this seems to line up fairly well with other calculators and tests I've done.

jortita
02-25-2018, 08:48 AM
Ancestry DNA

South Indian 20.864%
Munda 16.573%
Iranian 11.103%
North Caucasian 9.448%
Northwest Indian 8.912%
Malay 6.213%
Tibetan-Burman 5.919%
Southern Caucasian 4.059%
Pamirs 3.693%
Southern Chinese 3.086%
Mongolian 2.614% Papu
1.793%
Altaic 1.276%
Nordic 1.195%
Chuvash 0.983%
North American Indians 0.628%
East Asia 0.568%
Indo-Central Peninsula 0.428%
Central African Safari Nation 0.259%
Siberian 0.209%
Ethnic Group of Nile Basin 0.151%
Mediterranean 0.001%
Western Mediterranean 0.001%
Central American Indians 0.001%
Baltic 0.001%
Amazon 0.001%
Southern African Safari 0.001%
Tungus Ethnicity 0.001%
Eastern African Safari 0.001%
0.001% of people in the Sahel
Ural language ethnic 0.001%
Western Finland 0.001% of people
in West Africa 0.001 percent
Celtics 0.001%
in the North Sea Germanic 0.001%
Northeast Asia 0.001%
Andean people 0.001%
Eastern Europe 0.001%
Arabs 0.001%
Aomo language groups 0.001%
Eastern Mediterranean 0.001%
Original Austronesian 0.001%
Cuban Turk 0.001%
North Africa 0.001%
Eastern Iberian 0.001%
Northern Iberian 0.001%
Khushto 0.001%

Calamus
02-25-2018, 10:53 AM
My results:

24.483% Nordic
18.397% North Sea German
15.947% Celtic
8.214% Baltic
8.171% West Finland
8.171% Eastern Europe
4.612% Eastern Iberian
3.328% Chuvash
2.692% Mediterranean
2.318% Southern Caucasian
1.165% Iranian
1.165% Northern Iberian
0.644% North Africa
0.522% Western Mediterranean
0.076% Papuans

Rest is 0.001%, so i havn't included them.

Looks reasonable. Finnish is lower than expecteded, normally it is over 10% for me. Iranian is a surprise, havn't seen that before. Wonder what could be the reason for that?

Dorsetshireman
02-25-2018, 11:56 AM
21737

I cut off the million and one 0.001% results. I'm assuming that what's described on mine as "Northern European" is Chrome's translation of what some people are getting as "Nordic".

Nibelung
02-25-2018, 09:11 PM
delete post

Hurricane
02-25-2018, 10:20 PM
Mine (23andMe)

West Africa 36.498%
North Africa 11.205%
Kuchit 11.144%
Nile basin language group 10.472%
Arab 7.473%
Sahel 3.627%
Safari in Central Africa 3.336%
Eastern Africa safari 2.922%
Iranian 2.662%
Northern Iberian 2.458%
Eastern Mediterranean 1.436%
East Iberian 1.197%
Safari in southern Africa 1.177%
Mediterranean 1.150%
South Indian 1.016%
Pamir 0.881%
Northwest Indian 0.855%
Papua 0.352%
Malays 0.110%

Western Mediterranean 0.001%
Chinese southerners 0.001%
Chinese and American Indians 0.001%
Baltic 0.001%
Amazon 0.001%
North European ethnic 0.001%
Tungus Ethnicity 0.001%
East Asia 0.001%
Ural ethnic 0.001%
Western Finland 0.001%
Celtic 0.001%
North Sea German 0.001%
Siberian 0.001%
Mongolian 0.001%
Chuvash 0.001%
Northeast Asia 0.001%
Indochina 0.001%
Andes 0.001%
Eastern Europe 0.001%
North American Indians 0.001%
Monda ethnic group 0.001%
Omo ethnic group 0.001%
The original Austronesian population 0.001%
Altai people 0.001%
Cuban Turk 0.001%
North Caucasian 0.001%
South Caucasian 0.001%
Tibetan-Burma 0.001%

Mine (AncestryDNA)

West Africa 34.550%
Nile basin language group 14.726%
North Africa 11.262%
The Kuchu language family 10.294%
Arabs 7.202%
Iranian 3.550%
Sahelians 3.525%
Safari in Central Africa 3.152%
Northern Iberian 2.185%
Africa Eastern Safari 1.987%
Mediterranean 1.759%
Northwest Indian 0.949%
Eastern Mediterranean 0.882%
Safari in southern Africa 0.810%
South Indian 0.723%
Malays 0.711%
East Iberian 0.656%
Pamir 0.631%
Papua 0.246%
Eastern Europe 0.172%

Western Mediterranean 0.001%
Chinese southerners 0.001%
Chinese and American Indians 0.001%
Baltic 0.001%
Amazon 0.001%
North European ethnic 0.001%
Tungus Ethnicity 0.001%
East Asia 0.001%
Ural ethnic 0.001%
Western Finland 0.001%
Celtic 0.001%
North Sea German 0.001%
Siberian 0.001%
Mongolian 0.001%
Chuvash 0.001%
Northeast Asia 0.001%
Indochina 0.001%
Andes 0.001%
North American Indians 0.001%
Monda ethnic group 0.001%
Omo ethnic group 0.001%
The original Austronesian population 0.001%
Altai people 0.001%
Cuban Turk 0.001%
North Caucasian 0.001%
South Caucasian 0.001%
Tibetan-Burma 0.001%



Dad

West Africa 30.186%
Arabs 12.400%
North Africa 12.255%
Kuchet family 10.471%
Nile basin language population 8.638%
Eastern Mediterranean 5.728%
Iranian 3.349%
Sahel 3.303%
Northern Iberian 2.938%
Safari of Eastern Africa 2.843%
Safari in Central Africa 2.394%
South Caucasian 2.156%
East Iberian 1.143%
Western Mediterranean 0.890%
North Caucasian 0.741%
Papuan 0.302%
Mediterranean 0.196%
Omo ethnic group 0.038%

Pamirs 0.001%
Chinese southerners 0.001%
Chinese and American Indians 0.001%
Malay 0.001%
Baltic 0.001%
Amazon 0.001%
Safari in South Africa 0.001%
North European ethnic 0.001%
Tungus Ethnicity 0.001%
East Asia 0.001%
Northwest Indians 0.001%
Ural ethnic 0.001%
Western Finland 0.001%
Celtic 0.001%
North Sea German 0.001%
Siberian 0.001%
Mongolian 0.001%
Chuvash 0.001%
Northeast Asia 0.001%
South Indians 0.001%
Indochina 0.001%
Andes 0.001%
Eastern Europe 0.001%
North American Indians 0.001%
Monda ethnic group 0.001%
The original Austronesian population 0.001%
Altai people 0.001%
Cuban Turk 0.001%
Tibetan-Burma 0.001%

Mom

West Africa 47.548%
Nile basin language group 13.236%
North Africa 9.998%
Kuhit language family 9.995%
Africa Eastern Safari 4.069%
Sahelians 3.588%
Central African Safari 3.011%
Eastern Europe 1.495%
East Iberian 1.486%
Iranian 1.383%
South Indian 1.199%
Arab 1.133%
North Sea German 1.122%
Northwest Indian 0.341%
Papu people 0.238%
Indochina Peninsula 0.068%
Northern Iberian 0.058%

Mediterranean0.001%
Pamirs 0.001%
Western Mediterranean 0.001%
Chinese southerners 0.001%
Chinese and American Indians 0.001%
Malay 0.001%
Baltic 0.001%
Amazon 0.001%
Safari in South Africa 0.001%
North European ethnic 0.001%
Tungus Ethnicity 0.001%
East Asia 0.001%
Ural ethnic 0.001%
Western Finland 0.001%
Celtic 0.001%
Siberian 0.001%
Mongolian 0.001%
Chuvash 0.001%
Northeast Asia 0.001%
Andes 0.001%
North American Indians 0.001%
Monda ethnic group 0.001%
Omo ethnic group 0.001%
Eastern Mediterranean 0.001%
The original Austronesian population 0.001%
Altai people 0.001%
Cuban Turk 0.001%
North Caucasian 0.001%
South Caucasian 0.001%
Tibetan-Burma 0.001%

khanabadoshi
02-25-2018, 10:52 PM
I only posted scores > 0.001%.

Myself



North Caucasian 20.687%
South Indian 19.469%
Iranians 16.476%
Pamir 9.145%
Munda population 8.627%
Northwest Indian 8.594%
South Caucasian 6.930%
Ural ethnic 2.179%
Siberian 2.114%
North Sea German 1.068%
Papuans 0.861%
Baltic Sea 0.783%
Omo ethnic group 0.767%
Celtic 0.699%
Sino-American Indian 0.575%
North American Indian 0.272%
Amazon 0.224%
Arabs 0.203%
Chuvash 0.171%
Malays 0.093%
Nordic ethnic group 0.035%
Mongolian 0.003%


"Father"



Iranian 17.638%
South Indian 15.988%
North Caucasian 14.424%
South Caucasian 11.991%
Northwest Indian 9.818%
Pamir 9.217%
Munda ethnic group 8.708%
North Sea German 3.127%
Western Finland 2.914%
West Africa 1.604%
Ural ethnic group 1.244%
Papuan 1.235%
North American Indian 0.688%
Chinese and American Indians 0.442%
Amazon 0.391%
Tibetan-Myanmar ethnic group 0.383%
Eastern Mediterranean 0.088%
Chuvash 0.073%


"Mother"



Iranians 16.320%
South Indian 15.349%
North Caucasian 13.723%
Pamir 11.023%
Munda ethnic group 8.416%
Northwest Indian 8.264%
South Caucasian 6.168%
Baltic 4.161%
Tibetan-Burma population 3.571%
Celtic 2.089%
Ural ethnic group 1.669%
Eastern Europe 1.636%
Altai 1.432%
Amazon 1.261%
Omo language group 1.229%
North American Indians 1.053%
Papua 0.892%
North Sea German 0.690%
West Africa 0.499%
Andes 0.395%
Sahel 0.134%


"Maternal Grandfather"



South Indian 22.181%
North Caucasian 15.615%
Iranian 12.505%
Munda ethnic group 11.950%
Pamir 10.075%
Northwest Indian 9.892%
South Caucasian 8.011%
Chuvash 3.782%
Ural ethnic group 1.437%
Eastern Mediterranean 1.015%
North Sea German 0.764%
Papuan 0.699%
Celtic 0.560%
West Africa 0.507%
Omo language group 0.468%
Safari in South Africa 0.267%
Africa Eastern Hunting Race 0.097%
Kuchu language family 0.083%
Sahel 0.039%
Western Finland 0.026%


Maternal Grandmother



North Caucasian 15.654%
Iranian 15.297%
Pamir 12.381%
South Indian 8.797%
Northwest Indian 7.827%
South Caucasian 6.977%
Celtic 5.024%
Tibetan-Burma population 4.086%
Baltic Sea 3.539%
Ural ethnic group 3.479%
Mongolian population 3.423%
Eastern Europe 3.379%
Altai people 2.427%
Chuvash 1.623%
Amazon 1.567%
Tungusic ethnic group 1.163%
Sino-American Native American 0.985%
North Sea German 0.653%
Omar ethnic group 0.637%
Nordic 0.538%
Papu people 0.519%

Censored
02-26-2018, 12:10 AM
I only posted scores > 0.001%.

Myself



North Caucasian 20.687%
South Indian 19.469%
Iranians 16.476%
Pamir 9.145%
Munda population 8.627%
Northwest Indian 8.594%
South Caucasian 6.930%
Ural ethnic 2.179%
Siberian 2.114%
North Sea German 1.068%
Papuans 0.861%
Baltic Sea 0.783%
Omo ethnic group 0.767%
Celtic 0.699%
Sino-American Indian 0.575%
North American Indian 0.272%
Amazon 0.224%
Arabs 0.203%
Chuvash 0.171%
Malays 0.093%
Nordic ethnic group 0.035%
Mongolian 0.003%


"Father"



Iranian 17.638%
South Indian 15.988%
North Caucasian 14.424%
South Caucasian 11.991%
Northwest Indian 9.818%
Pamir 9.217%
Munda ethnic group 8.708%
North Sea German 3.127%
Western Finland 2.914%
West Africa 1.604%
Ural ethnic group 1.244%
Papuan 1.235%
North American Indian 0.688%
Chinese and American Indians 0.442%
Amazon 0.391%
Tibetan-Myanmar ethnic group 0.383%
Eastern Mediterranean 0.088%
Chuvash 0.073%


"Mother"



Iranians 16.320%
South Indian 15.349%
North Caucasian 13.723%
Pamir 11.023%
Munda ethnic group 8.416%
Northwest Indian 8.264%
South Caucasian 6.168%
Baltic 4.161%
Tibetan-Burma population 3.571%
Celtic 2.089%
Ural ethnic group 1.669%
Eastern Europe 1.636%
Altai 1.432%
Amazon 1.261%
Omo language group 1.229%
North American Indians 1.053%
Papua 0.892%
North Sea German 0.690%
West Africa 0.499%
Andes 0.395%
Sahel 0.134%


"Maternal Grandfather"



South Indian 22.181%
North Caucasian 15.615%
Iranian 12.505%
Munda ethnic group 11.950%
Pamir 10.075%
Northwest Indian 9.892%
South Caucasian 8.011%
Chuvash 3.782%
Ural ethnic group 1.437%
Eastern Mediterranean 1.015%
North Sea German 0.764%
Papuan 0.699%
Celtic 0.560%
West Africa 0.507%
Omo language group 0.468%
Safari in South Africa 0.267%
Africa Eastern Hunting Race 0.097%
Kuchu language family 0.083%
Sahel 0.039%
Western Finland 0.026%


Maternal Grandmother



North Caucasian 15.654%
Iranian 15.297%
Pamir 12.381%
South Indian 8.797%
Northwest Indian 7.827%
South Caucasian 6.977%
Celtic 5.024%
Tibetan-Burma population 4.086%
Baltic Sea 3.539%
Ural ethnic group 3.479%
Mongolian population 3.423%
Eastern Europe 3.379%
Altai people 2.427%
Chuvash 1.623%
Amazon 1.567%
Tungusic ethnic group 1.163%
Sino-American Native American 0.985%
North Sea German 0.653%
Omar ethnic group 0.637%
Nordic 0.538%
Papu people 0.519%


Is it common for Pakistanis to be admixed with non-South Asian groups?

Abd.H
02-26-2018, 12:36 AM
My results

South Caucasus 18.235%
Eastern Mediterranean 14.902 %
Iranians 12.220%
Arabs 11.938%
Western Mediterranean 10.008%
Northern Caucasians 9.545%
Mediterranean 6.745%
North Africa 3.996%
Khushto 3.213 %
Old Balkans 2.681%
Northern Iberians 2.624%
North West Indians 1.994%
Pamirs 0.568%
North Sea Germans 0.468%
East Iberians 0.354%
Papu 0.304%
Mongols 0.166%
South Indians 0.009%

MonkeyDLuffy
02-26-2018, 01:13 AM
I only posted scores > 0.001%.

Myself



North Caucasian 20.687%
South Indian 19.469%
Iranians 16.476%
Pamir 9.145%
Munda population 8.627%
Northwest Indian 8.594%
South Caucasian 6.930%
Ural ethnic 2.179%
Siberian 2.114%
North Sea German 1.068%
Papuans 0.861%
Baltic Sea 0.783%
Omo ethnic group 0.767%
Celtic 0.699%
Sino-American Indian 0.575%
North American Indian 0.272%
Amazon 0.224%
Arabs 0.203%
Chuvash 0.171%
Malays 0.093%
Nordic ethnic group 0.035%
Mongolian 0.003%


"Father"



Iranian 17.638%
South Indian 15.988%
North Caucasian 14.424%
South Caucasian 11.991%
Northwest Indian 9.818%
Pamir 9.217%
Munda ethnic group 8.708%
North Sea German 3.127%
Western Finland 2.914%
West Africa 1.604%
Ural ethnic group 1.244%
Papuan 1.235%
North American Indian 0.688%
Chinese and American Indians 0.442%
Amazon 0.391%
Tibetan-Myanmar ethnic group 0.383%
Eastern Mediterranean 0.088%
Chuvash 0.073%


"Mother"



Iranians 16.320%
South Indian 15.349%
North Caucasian 13.723%
Pamir 11.023%
Munda ethnic group 8.416%
Northwest Indian 8.264%
South Caucasian 6.168%
Baltic 4.161%
Tibetan-Burma population 3.571%
Celtic 2.089%
Ural ethnic group 1.669%
Eastern Europe 1.636%
Altai 1.432%
Amazon 1.261%
Omo language group 1.229%
North American Indians 1.053%
Papua 0.892%
North Sea German 0.690%
West Africa 0.499%
Andes 0.395%
Sahel 0.134%


"Maternal Grandfather"



South Indian 22.181%
North Caucasian 15.615%
Iranian 12.505%
Munda ethnic group 11.950%
Pamir 10.075%
Northwest Indian 9.892%
South Caucasian 8.011%
Chuvash 3.782%
Ural ethnic group 1.437%
Eastern Mediterranean 1.015%
North Sea German 0.764%
Papuan 0.699%
Celtic 0.560%
West Africa 0.507%
Omo language group 0.468%
Safari in South Africa 0.267%
Africa Eastern Hunting Race 0.097%
Kuchu language family 0.083%
Sahel 0.039%
Western Finland 0.026%


Maternal Grandmother



North Caucasian 15.654%
Iranian 15.297%
Pamir 12.381%
South Indian 8.797%
Northwest Indian 7.827%
South Caucasian 6.977%
Celtic 5.024%
Tibetan-Burma population 4.086%
Baltic Sea 3.539%
Ural ethnic group 3.479%
Mongolian population 3.423%
Eastern Europe 3.379%
Altai people 2.427%
Chuvash 1.623%
Amazon 1.567%
Tungusic ethnic group 1.163%
Sino-American Native American 0.985%
North Sea German 0.653%
Omar ethnic group 0.637%
Nordic 0.538%
Papu people 0.519%


I'm more surprised about you and I are not that off in terms of South Indian and Munda in this calculator. Probably NW Indian is hiding some ASI.

Mingle
02-26-2018, 06:37 AM
I already know my results for this calc, so something went wrong here. Dunno why but I got a lot of SSA.



West Africa 13.512%
Aomo language ethnic 10.287%
Mediterranean 8.730%
Central African safari 8.089 percent ethnic
Malays 7.125%
in the North Sea Germanic 6.615%
South Indian 6.079%
Northern Europe Ethnic 4.965%
North Caucasian 4.174%
Chuvash 4.001%
Baltic 3.430 percent
safari in east Africa 3.231% ethnic
Papuans 2.679%
Cushitic languages 2.451%
Altai people 2.036 percent
Celtics 2.033%
Northeast Asia 2.029%
Tibeto-Burman Ethnic group 1.916%
Northwest Indian 1.782%
Ethnic Nile basin 1.436%
Mongolian 0.879%
Southern Chinese 0.695%
Andes 0.401%
Western Mediterranean 0.393%
Original South Island language group 0.388%
Pamir 0.292%
Sahrawi 0.207%
Safari in southern Africa 0.124%
Central American Indian 0.001%
Amazon 0.001%
Iranian 0.001%
Tungus Ethnicity 0.001%
East Asia 0.001%
Ural Ethnic 0.001%
Western Finland 0.001%
Siberian 0.001%
Indo-Central 0.001%
Eastern Europe 0.001%
Arab 0.001%
North American Indian 0.001% of the
Monadian population 0.001%
Eastern Mediterranean 0.001%
Ancient Balkans 0.001%
Southern Caucasian 0.001%
North Africa 0.001%
Eastern Iberian 0.001%
Northern Iberian 0.001%

khanabadoshi
02-26-2018, 08:15 AM
Is it common for Pakistanis to be admixed with non-South Asian groups?

Not in the sense you are asking. In the case of this calculator the names are given based on the population they peak in, so x% Iranian is x% I share with Iranians that happens to peak in them, but is not exclusive to them. Make sense? It doesn't mean I'm literally x% Iranian. Apply this to the South Asian groups as well, 25% Munda, doesn't mean one of my Grandparents was Munda... to be more technical now -- it means, 25% of my alleles were best matched with the alleles that peak in the Munda group (but are not exclusive to them), and thus, 25% of my alleles are common with them -- not necessarily derived from them. Now if it were established that certain alleles were exclusive to one group or another, and could only be from them, then this would be a different ballgame. However, in this scenario, it isn't the case.

Secondly, it's not a good idea to base what is normal in Pakistan on my family's results. In fact, I tend to do the exact opposite, I would look at your scores to understand how things are placing for myself and relatives. This is because my background is a little more complicated than most, and the mixes within my family are from divergent populations within the region. Since they are my relatives, I know by heart what all their admixtures are, and I can glance and understand why so-and-so got this or that. However, for most everyone else, even when I type out each of their mixes, it's hard to follow whats going on haha. In any case, it does give an idea of the spectrum, if nothing else.

khanabadoshi
02-26-2018, 08:17 AM
I already know my results for this calc, so something went wrong here. Dunno why but I got a lot of SSA.




What company/version did you test with?

Censored
02-26-2018, 08:27 AM
Not in the sense you are asking. In the case of this calculator the names are given based on the population they peak in, so x% Iranian is x% I share with Iranians that happens to peak in them, but is not exclusive to them. Make sense? It doesn't mean I'm literally x% Iranian. Apply this to the South Asian groups as well, 25% Munda, doesn't mean one of my Grandparents was Munda... to be more technical now -- it means, 25% of my alleles were best matched with the alleles that peak in the Munda group (but are not exclusive to them), and thus, 25% of my alleles are common with them -- not necessarily derived from them. Now if it were established that certain alleles were exclusive to one group or another, and could only be from them, then this would be a different ballgame. However, in this scenario, it isn't the case.

Secondly, it's not a good idea to base what is normal in Pakistan on my family's results. In fact, I tend to do the exact opposite, I would look at your scores to understand how things are placing for myself and relatives. This is because my background is a little more complicated than most, and the mixes within my family are from divergent populations within the region. Since they are my relatives, I know by heart what all their admixtures are, and I can glance and understand why so-and-so got this or that. However, for most everyone else, even when I type out each of their mixes, it's hard to follow whats going on haha. In any case, it does give an idea of the spectrum, if nothing else.

Nah, I wasn't talking about those percentages per say, I just looked at your ethnicity label and you seem to be 3 different group, 1 is Uzbek which is not native to the region.

khanabadoshi
02-26-2018, 08:33 AM
Nah, I wasn't talking about those percentages per say, I just looked at your ethnicity label and you seem to be 3 different group, 1 is Uzbek which is not native to the region.

It's uncommon. There are not many Uzbeks in Pakistan. My grandmother's father is from Tashkent.

Censored
02-26-2018, 09:27 AM
It's uncommon. There are not many Uzbeks in Pakistan. My grandmother's father is from Tashkent.

Hmm, looking at your ethnic make up I’m honestly surprised you score as much south Indian as you do. I would expect very little if any given how northern shifted you are.

The other Punjabi guy said you have similar results to him so that’s why it’s surprising.

Exosuits
02-26-2018, 09:44 AM
Original South Island language groups = Proto-Austronesians
Monadian Ethnics = Munda
Minorities of Omoro = Omotic


https://i.imgur.com/3rg4M10.jpg

khanabadoshi
02-26-2018, 10:39 AM
Hmm, looking at your ethnic make up Iím honestly surprised you score as much south Indian as you do. I would expect very little if any given how northern shifted you are.

The other Punjabi guy said you have similar results to him so thatís why itís surprising.

My Maternal Grandfather is 25% mixed with something unknown maybe Bihari or Marwari, something with high south Indian so I get most of my South Indian + most of anything Steppe-related BOTH from my mom, ironic. My Father is the same thing as my Maternal Grandfather but half Kashmiri... so he is more mixed, but less South Indian, despite the Kashmiri -- so that's what tells me whatever 25% is in my maternal Grandfather must be pretty south or eastern. So you are right, I do score more South Indian than the what should be based on my majority ethnicity, but the smaller parts have their effects too. If my great grandfather's Uzbek shows up as a some central asian, my great grandmothers SI is going to show up too. On top of all that my Baloch side is all settled in Punjab, so very likely some mixing locally has occurred over the years, and of course it's very possible we just think we are Baloch, but are in fact Sindhi or Jatt or something. However, based on how my "father" scores, I'd wager my grandfather was probably mostly Baloch. My scores make sense when you look at all the other people I post, because I'm just a mix of them. They also show it doesn't even take 2 generations to have a very different admixture profile.

Mingle
02-26-2018, 01:10 PM
What company/version did you test with?

23andMe V5.

khanabadoshi
02-26-2018, 04:09 PM
23andMe V5.

This is likely the reason for your results. He formed the calculator using SNPs not tested for in V5. It's optimized for older versions, and so doesn't account for the many SNPs you did test for. 100% of your alleles must be assigned in an admixture calculator, so the calculator had exact references for few of your 600K+ SNPs assigned (ie. RS2342325 A;A was designated to tally into the W African category; you don't have that SNP, you have RS235236. The calculator doesn't have something to correspond to that -- so it's like ???)

Despite various SNP coverage in different versions or companies, certain SNPs stay, and these are often SNPs that seem to define African/non-African or West Eurasian/East Eurasian. From the calculator's perspective, it doesn't know what to do with the 80% of SNPs that it doesn't recognize and makes due with 20% or so alleles leftover. In sets where certain regions are defined by a narrow range of specific SNP/alleles (ie. this calculator has many European components, and inherently each must be defined by few and specific SNPs/alleles in order to achieve such a level of differentiation), it assumes that your alleles definitely can't be from those groups (because they are narrow and you don't match exactly), and assigns them to components that encompass a broader range of SNPs/alleles that are not so well defined.

So you'll notice samples that have low-coverage from whatever test/company, usually score a lot of African components or East Asian or some other region that don't require as rigid SNP constraints to form a K-component. This is why you scored so much African populations, and it's the same reason the Yunusbayev Tajikistani samples do too in many Gedmatch calculators -- poor SNP overlap.

On some calculators that incorporate samples from these low-overlapping chips in their runs, your results will be totally fine. f.ex. Harappa uses the Xing samples and the Yunusbayev samples... both have low coverage with V4...but since they are a part of the run, the calculator only used the SNPs that do overlap between them, and so probably your results are fine on those.

Mingle
02-26-2018, 05:10 PM
This is likely the reason for your results. He formed the calculator using SNPs not tested for in V5. It's optimized for older versions, and so doesn't account for the many SNPs you did test for. 100% of your alleles must be assigned in an admixture calculator, so the calculator had exact references for few of your 600K+ SNPs assigned (ie. RS2342325 A;A was designated to tally into the W African category; you don't have that SNP, you have RS235236. The calculator doesn't have something to correspond to that -- so it's like ???)

Despite various SNP coverage in different versions or companies, certain SNPs stay, and these are often SNPs that seem to define African/non-African or West Eurasian/East Eurasian. From the calculator's perspective, it doesn't know what to do with the 80% of SNPs that it doesn't recognize and makes due with 20% or so alleles leftover. In sets where certain regions are defined by a narrow range of specific SNP/alleles (ie. this calculator has many European components, and inherently each must be defined by few and specific SNPs/alleles in order to achieve such a level of differentiation), it assumes that your alleles definitely can't be from those groups (because they are narrow and you don't match exactly), and assigns them to components that encompass a broader range of SNPs/alleles that are not so well defined.

So you'll notice samples that have low-coverage from whatever test/company, usually score a lot of African components or East Asian or some other region that don't require as rigid SNP constraints to form a K-component. This is why you scored so much African populations, and it's the same reason the Yunusbayev Tajikistani samples do too in many Gedmatch calculators -- poor SNP overlap.

On some calculators that incorporate samples from these low-overlapping chips in their runs, your results will be totally fine. f.ex. Harappa uses the Xing samples and the Yunusbayev samples... both have low coverage with V4...but since they are a part of the run, the calculator only used the SNPs that do overlap between them, and so probably your results are fine on those.

Interesting, because I already got my K47 results before by using my V5 chip.

These are my K47 results:


0.00% Kushitic
0.00% North-Iberian
0.02% East-Iberian
0.00% Tibeto-Burman
0.00% North-African
6.37% South-Caucasian
21.24% North-Caucasian
0.00% Paleo-Balkan
0.00% Turkic-Altai
0.00% Proto-Austronesian
0.00% Nilotic
0.09% East-Med
0.00% Omotic
4.98% Munda
0.98% North-Amerind
0.00% Arabic
0.00% East-Euro
0.00% Central-African_HG
0.00% Andean
0.00% Indo-Chinese
17.74% South-Indian
0.00% NE-Asian
0.00% Volgan
0.00% Mongolian
0.00% Siberian
3.43% North-Sea_Germanic
0.00% Celtic
0.00% West-African
0.81% West-Finnic
2.51% Uralic
0.61% Sahelian
9.88% NW-Indian
0.00% East-African_HG
0.00% East-Asian
0.00% Amuro-Manchurian
4.54% Scando-Germanic
20.37% Iranian
0.00% South-African_HG
0.00% Amazonian
0.20% Baltic
0.00% Malay
0.00% Meso-Amerind
0.00% South-Chinese
0.00% Papuan
0.00% West-Med
6.24% Pamirian
0.00% Central-Med

ssamlal
02-26-2018, 05:28 PM
My Wegene K47 results. Website disclaimer: "Since the site coverage is too low, 23andme V5 chip results are for reference"




23andMe.v5
myHeritage
Ancestry


West Africa
14.43




Nordic population
12.89




Aomo language ethnic
10.35




North Caucasian
7.34
4.51
4.33


Malaysian
5.68




Ural language ethnic
5.20




Central African safari ethnic
4.40




Mediterranean
3.98
1.51
1.50


South Caucasian
3.60
1.05
1.12


Northwest Indians
3.21
12.26
12.25


Chinese southerners
2.81




Nile Basin language ethnic
2.53
0.81
0.82


Andean people
2.39
0.22
0.29


Papuans
2.33




original Austronesian ethnic
2.29




Cushitic languages
2.26




Eastern Europe
2.24




West Finns
1.81
0.23
0.21


Iranians
1.78
12.21
12.24


Chuvash
1.33
0.18
0.21


South Indian
1.28
31.38
31.40


safari nation east African
1.26
0.33
0.33


southern African nation safari
1.24




North Africa
0.71




Pamir people
0.70
7.50
7.47


Western Mediterranean
0.69




east Asia
0.66




Sacher Le people
0.60




Central American Indians





Baltic





Amazon

1.13
1.08


Tungus Ethnicity





Celtic





North Sea German

0.87
0.85


Siberian





Mongolian





Northeast Asia





Indo-China





Arab





North American Indians





Monda Minority

21.16
21.17


Eastern Mediterranean

1.24
1.32


Altai





Ancient Balkans





Tibetan-Burman

3.38
3.39


Eastern Iberian





Northern Iberian

lukaszM
02-26-2018, 08:05 PM
Hi guys. I didn't realize they upload my K47 without any permissiom. Can you tell it is free for users already on Wegene? Or they want you to pay for it?
https://anthrogenica.com/showthread.php?12788-New-K30-K47-World-Calculator&p=355805&viewfull=1#post355805

lukaszM
02-26-2018, 08:08 PM
I already know my results for this calc, so something went wrong here. Dunno why but I got a lot of SSA.



West Africa 13.512%
Aomo language ethnic 10.287%
Mediterranean 8.730%
Central African safari 8.089 percent ethnic


I know what is wrong but I don't tell them for free:)

star rider
02-26-2018, 08:50 PM
here's mine:

21796 more questions than answers :)

lukaszM
02-26-2018, 09:21 PM
I don't take responsibility of K47 results from Wegene.

From what I saw here there are much more noisy comparing to mine original K47, and some people are skewed toward SSA.

Dibran
02-26-2018, 10:49 PM
Me:

Ancient Balkan 18.602%
Eastern Mediterranean 13.487%
Western Mediterranean 11.273%
Eastern Europe 10.932%
Mediterranean 7.136%
Celtic 7.095%
South Caucasian 6.368%
East Iberian 6.244%
Northern Iberian 6.018%
North Caucasian 4.353%
Nordic 3.828%
Arabs 2.145%
North Sea German 1.873%
Baltic Sea 0.377%
North Africa 0.238%

khanabadoshi
02-26-2018, 11:15 PM
I know what is wrong but I don't tell them for free:)

Someone must have edited your calc file and uploaded it, but made some mistake when they did? Or uploaded an older version of the calc?
The calc is free on the site, to answer your question. But still, bad not to give you credit for it.
Your choice of names for components was unique to you, it can't be chance. People seem to posting questions to the "calc-maker" about it on the site. Let's see if he/she replies to them.

Modernancientdna
02-27-2018, 12:55 AM
Original LukaszM K47

28.76% East-Euro
13.40% Baltic
12.53% West-Finnic
8.16% Scando-Germanic
6.98% North-Sea_Germanic
6.70% Celtic
5.68% North-Caucasian
4.13% North-Iberian
3.43% Central-Med
3.02% Paleo-Balkan
2.68% East-Iberian
1.82% North-African
0.95% Pamirian
0.49% South-African_HG
0.44% West-Med
0.42% Kushitic
0.27% Volgan
0.12% Iranian
0.01% Nilotic
0.01% South-Caucasian

Wegene

28.77% Eastern Europe
13.39% Baltic
12.54% Western Finns
8.16% Nordic ethnic group
6.99% North Sea German
6.70% Celtic
5.75% North Caucasian
4.14% Northern Iberian
3.44% Mediterranean
3.03% Cuban dry
2.69% East Iberian
1.83% North African
0.98% Pamir
0.49% Safari in South Africa
0.45% Kuchet language family
0.41% Western Mediterranean
0.22% Chuvash

lukaszM
02-27-2018, 10:52 AM
Wegene answered https://anthrogenica.com/showthread.php?12788-New-K30-K47-World-Calculator&p=356021&viewfull=1#post356021


Hi @lukaszM, I am Xiaoli from WeGene and we wish to sincerely apologise for our mistake of not properly citing your work. We highly appreciate the important work our open-source community has done and fully recognise that you should get all all the credits for this excellent work. There is no excuse for us not mentioning your name neither inform you in advance. We've now included the author info in the page [ www(dot)wegene(dot)com/crowdsourcing/details/288] and just want to say sorry again!

By the way, the tool was actually uploaded in our "crowdsourcing" section which is intended for community developers to upload their tools so users can use those much more easily (say instead of setting up environments, downloading tools, etc., simply go to the page and get the results). If you are interested to get your tools to be used by more Chinese (mostly :p) users and get feedbacks, we would love to help - also some kind of reward systems are in consideration so you might be better rewarded for all the extraordinary works.

Sorry and thanks!!

VelvetNono
03-10-2018, 07:11 PM
Background: 3/4 Afghan Pashtun and 1/4 Afghan Tajik (With some Dardic (Pashai and possibly Nuristani) admixture as well).

My Results:

https://scontent.fybz2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/29027654_2098348383526839_1709916898189115392_n.jp g?oh=8a0c17cd5b4c0f50db5c7fba331a53e4&oe=5B3DEA1F&_nc_o2e=z122d8876&efg=eyJhZG1pc3Npb25fY29udHJvbCI6MSwidXBsb2FkZXJfaW QiOiIxMDAwMDA1NTA5NDQwMzYifQ%3D%3D
https://scontent.fybz2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/29101687_2098348370193507_2340664465155948544_n.jp g?oh=28ce50c053fa8a2490090d025893ea30&oe=5B37D0EF&_nc_o2e=z34febf45&efg=eyJhZG1pc3Npb25fY29udHJvbCI6MSwidXBsb2FkZXJfaW QiOiIxMDAwMDA1NTA5NDQwMzYifQ%3D%3D
https://scontent.fybz2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/29063605_2098348350193509_256234038027616256_n.jpg ?oh=4cdadb00aa46590f8da170ba609ab318&oe=5B4396CB&_nc_o2e=z996f2944&efg=eyJhZG1pc3Npb25fY29udHJvbCI6MSwidXBsb2FkZXJfaW QiOiIxMDAwMDA1NTA5NDQwMzYifQ%3D%3D

Censored
03-11-2018, 01:17 AM
Mine is 7.56%, I would assume Tulu Bunts would score higher - so its not particularly high

Maybe its high for Hyderabad

Also non-Brahmin South Indians do score NE Euro but limited to certain castes and communities

Some Christians from Kerala score NE Euro too

What is your NE-Euro on Harappa?

kush
03-11-2018, 01:36 AM
The way I see it, that Brahmin that Monkey is referring to is more likely partial Pashtun ancestry from my paternal grandfather. It makes sense considering phenotype and also if I was only half Brahmin the component would be lower than what it is. I may be wrong about this but I can send you photos of that part of the family if you're interested.

bro if you dont mind can you send me your pics along with your family's? You can PM me cause i'm really curious what you and your family looks like based on your results. Thanks

Censored
03-11-2018, 01:43 AM
bro if you dont mind can you send me your pics along with your family's? You can PM me cause i'm really curious what you and your family looks like based on your results. Thanks

Sure, give me a moment.

bmoney
03-11-2018, 06:43 AM
What is your NE-Euro on Harappa?

4.85%

Censored
03-11-2018, 06:49 AM
4.85%

Thanks.

Dimanto
03-11-2018, 07:52 PM
North Sea Germanic 12.591 %
Celtics 12.164 %
Levant 11.146%
Mediterranean 8.131%
North Iberian 7.966%
eastern Iberian 6.210%
ancient Balkans 6.084%
North Caucasian 5.853%
South Caucasian 5.815%
of the Nordic population 5.691 %
Eastern Europe 5.402%
Western Mediterranean 3.634%
Baltic 2.770%
Iranians 2.495%
North Africa 2.118%
Arabs 1.172%
Western Finland people 0.728%

Where is North/Eastern Iberian based on?

Dimanto
03-12-2018, 12:50 AM
http://i66.tinypic.com/2r213bd.png

kitbluee
03-18-2018, 11:17 PM
2.64% indian
63.98% hungarian
33.33% french
0.04% others



lol

digital_noise
03-19-2018, 06:30 PM
Here's mine. Its so far off its almost comical.

47.82% Hungarian
17.72% Spanish
13.11% Finnish/Russian
11.51% Sardinian
3.97% English
3.00% Ashkenazi
2.35% French

On paper, if everything was cleanly passed on I'm basically

50% English
25% Italian
25% Swedish/German/Dutch

Based on all the calculators and autosomal transfers I have done I appear to be:

33% NW European
24% NE European
43% Southern European (italy, Greece etc...)

Stephen1986
03-19-2018, 06:43 PM
My results -


Germans in the North Sea 21.136%
Celts 19.976 %
Nordic groups 12.010%
Western Finns 7.680%
Northern Iberians 6.891%
Baltic 6.791%
North Caucasian 6.009%
Eastern Europe 5.285%
Western Mediterranean 3.977%
East Iberians 3.881%
Mediterranean 3.247%
Chuvash 2.101%
Guerrillas 0.514% (which group is this meant to be?)
Iranian 0.469%

My brother's results -

Germans in the North Sea 20.594%
Celts 18.987%
Nordic groups 13.428%
West Finns 8.605%
East Iberia 6.349%
Baltic 5.296%
Guerrillas 4.774%
Mediterranean 4.349%
North Caucasians 4.336%
North Iberia 4.074%
Chuvash 2.745%
Eastern Europe 2.340%
Eastern Mediterranean 1.993%
Iranian 1.169%
Western Mediterranean 0.722%
South Caucasian 0.108%
Northwest Indians 0.099%

Sansui Yang
06-01-2021, 01:57 PM
My results.
44904

Aiden
06-03-2021, 10:02 PM
I miss this company, they seem to have completely died among the ancestry/genetics community, nobody talks about them anymore. They were supposed to start selling kits in the US but site still says "coming soon" for the past 2 years now. I always thought they had the best layout of the results.

Sansui Yang
06-04-2021, 03:52 PM
I miss this company, they seem to have completely died among the ancestry/genetics community, nobody talks about them anymore. They were supposed to start selling kits in the US but site still says "coming soon" for the past 2 years now. I always thought they had the best layout of the results.

Indeed. But wegene has recently released a number of new versions of test kits in the Chinese market, like wegene3.0, the new version of WGS. At the same time, They've developed some new functions recently about health. It seems like Wegene is focused on the Chinese market.