PDA

View Full Version : i2a1b or I2a2?



Absolutely
07-25-2018, 06:56 PM
I've been tested by MyHeritageDNA and am trying to narrow down my haplogroup based on this limited information.
1) By manually comparing the snps (which are relevant to haplogroups according to Promethease) on the isogg tree
and 2) by using a haplogroup predictor.
However, the results do not match. The predictor's result is like following:

i.imgur.com/LgFVmyG.png


As you can see it's based on ISOGG's 2013 tree.

I know about about naming discrepancies but can't figure it out.

Based on the latest version of the 2018 tree, the 2 last green marked SNPs
(rs7893064(A;A)/S150) & (rs17316729(A;A)/S120) make me a member of I2a1b 1.

Can anyone clarify this situation for me and tell me whether my current DNAinfo is even worth enough for haplo-research?

Thanks!

spruithean
07-26-2018, 05:56 PM
It is easier to refer to haplogroups by their shorthand names "I2-S150" or "I1-Y13039" versus I2a1b, etc due to the constant changing of the ISOGG tree and other similar phylogenetic trees.

deadly77
07-27-2018, 08:06 AM
The Illumina OmniExpress chip that MyHeritage uses for their DNA tests only includes 482 Y chromosome SNPs. This is lower than any of the other primarily autosomal chip test with the exception of FTDNA's FamilyFinder (which has zero). While I'm normally all for trying to get as much data as possible out of every DNA test that you've paid for, with the low number of Y-SNPs tested, and the possibility of no calls in such a small dataset, I wouldn't consider the MyHeritage data reliable for determining Y-DNA haplogroups.

Agree with Spruthean's point about the old vs. new nomenclature of Y-DNA haploroups - much easier to follow and not subject to confusing alphabet soup changes on different versions of the ISOGG tree.