PDA

View Full Version : FTDNA/ Geno 2.0 put me a X and X1 but pred. with MTDNA data from ftdna say H2h



Ahaddad
05-13-2021, 06:47 AM
Ftdna and Geno 2.0 say to me years ago that I'm X and X1 MTDNA haplogroup and these days I take ftdna data from MTDNA and put in this site:https://dna.jameslick.com/mthap/and for my surprise say other thing, what is my real MTDNA ? I'm Lebanese origin!!!


Here is the data that use as text

195T
247G
769G
825T
1018G
2395T
2758G
2885T
3594C
3795T
4104A
4312C
5302C
6221C
6371T
7256C
7521G
8468C
8655C
8701A
9489A
9540T
10398A
10664C
10688G
10810T
10873T
10915T
11914G
13105A
13276A
13326C
13506C
13650C
13966G
14470C
15654C
16129G
16140C
16169T
16230A
16311T

J1 DYS388=13
05-13-2021, 10:28 AM
The explanation is in the "Best Match" section from your James Lick mtDNA results. Post that here if you want to.

Ahaddad
05-13-2021, 12:01 PM
The explanation is in the "Best Match" section from your James Lick mtDNA results. Post that here if you want to.

What is? I didn't found

MacUalraig
05-13-2021, 12:35 PM
Ftdna and Geno 2.0 say to me years ago that I'm X and X1 MTDNA haplogroup and these days I take ftdna data from MTDNA and put in this site:https://dna.jameslick.com/mthap/and for my surprise say other thing, what is my real MTDNA ? I'm Lebanese origin!!!


Here is the data that use as text

195T
247G
769G
825T
1018G
2395T
2758G
2885T
3594C
3795T
4104A
4312C
5302C
6221C
6371T
7256C
7521G
8468C
8655C
8701A
9489A
9540T
10398A
10664C
10688G
10810T
10873T
10915T
11914G
13105A
13276A
13326C
13506C
13650C
13966G
14470C
15654C
16129G
16140C
16169T
16230A
16311T

It only takes a moment to check it yourself manually

http://phylotree.org/tree/X.htm

X T6221C C6371T A13966G T14470C T16189C! C16278T!

and you have all those except for the last two which are reverse mutations back to the ancestral value.

Ahaddad
05-13-2021, 01:23 PM
It only takes a moment to check it yourself manually

http://phylotree.org/tree/X.htm

X T6221C C6371T A13966G T14470C T16189C! C16278T!

and you have all those except for the last two which are reverse mutations back to the ancestral value.

So you think I'm X1 like Geno and ftdna say? Predictor say h2h

MacUalraig
05-13-2021, 02:25 PM
So you think I'm X1 like Geno and ftdna say? Predictor say h2h

It is best to study the tree, then you would see that H2h isn't even on the tree (it only has H2a/b/c).

If you read up on how the tree works a bit you will learn that the old version of the tree was based on someone in haplogroup H2a2a1. We now use the version I posted which is correctly rooted.

Yes I am confident you are hg X. You also by the way have mutation 8701 which defines N, the parent of X. But you lack 12705 and 16223 which define R, the parent of H.

MacUalraig
05-13-2021, 02:48 PM
I don't use the James Lick site but if I submit my own data to it it generates a report relative to the OLD tree and so has a number of lines like

"Marker path from rCRS to haplogroup <blah> (plus extra markers):
H2a2a1(rCRS) ⇨ 263G"

As I mentioned in a post above this is just because the old tree was based on someone in H2a2a1. It is tracing your tree branch relative to that person.
However, really he ought to not do this in my view. It should still give the same final answer but risks confusing the user along the way.

J1 DYS388=13
05-13-2021, 04:40 PM
The James Lick mtDNA site uses "Data updated to PhyloTree Build 17," 2016. What you see is what you get.

Ahaddad
05-14-2021, 07:00 AM
The James Lick mtDNA site uses "Data updated to PhyloTree Build 17," 2016. What you see is what you get.

Im X or H2h? Now confusing

J1 DYS388=13
05-14-2021, 08:08 AM
You are X

Ahaddad
05-14-2021, 08:13 AM
You are X

I mean X or H2a, so I'm X?

J1 DYS388=13
05-14-2021, 09:37 AM
yes X