user
07-12-2014, 02:37 PM
If I am correct on this, OOA states that we all have a common African ancestor that evolved into homo sapien sapien before emigrating from Africa. While Multiregional states that we all have a common, African, ancestor that left Africa and then later evolved into homo sapien sapien. Both theories essentially state the same thing (that we all have a common African ancestors, and that we all evolved into homo sapien sapiens) so why do some people try to use Multiregional as a justification for the idea that the "races" are genetically different when there has been a significant amount of research that supports otherwise.
As far as I know the only difference is in non-Sub Saharan Africans who have a certain percentage of Neanderthal DNA. However, this does not negate the fact that we are all homo sapien sapiens (modern humans) regardless. I know all people don't use multiregional for ulterior motives but some people do. However, they never use OOA for those same purposes.
Why such a fuss?
As far as I know the only difference is in non-Sub Saharan Africans who have a certain percentage of Neanderthal DNA. However, this does not negate the fact that we are all homo sapien sapiens (modern humans) regardless. I know all people don't use multiregional for ulterior motives but some people do. However, they never use OOA for those same purposes.
Why such a fuss?