PDA

View Full Version : S389+ Pictish?



castle3
12-24-2014, 06:17 PM
Prof Jim Wilson, who discovered S389, has kindly spent some valuable time trawling through a number of S389+ testees. He points out that about 0.5% of British men are in the R1b-S389 group, and that it should be included on ISOGG's tree. He has seen 33 surnames that have S389, so far.
Jim states that it is Scottish, "In fact very Eastern Scottish, focused on Central Scotland & Aberdeenshire, with instances in Fife & East Lothian". It is much rarer elsewhere in the Isles. He states that "the frequency distribution is a classic signature of 'Pictish' type. R1b-S735, the 'Scots' or Pictish group of R1b, has the exact same frequency peak, but is 20x more common".
Armstrong is the most numerous surname in the S389 group, but there is also another, typically NE Scottish surname which appears twice: this in a relatively small sample.
Jim doesn't believe S389 is Flemish, and expects it to be absent from continental Europe.
Jim suggests that FGC or whole Y chromosome sequencing would be extremely beneficial in pinpointing the actual age of S389. He finishes by saying that "If Y sequencing gives a young date, this looks to be another Pictish group! At the very least, it was carried by people who lived in what we now call Scotland, 2000 or however many years ago".
I'd like to thank Jim profusely for taking the time & trouble to offer his guidance - especially with Xmas upon us.
Cheers to all!
Bob
PS I obtained Jim's permission to post his views, which I've precised here. I hope I've got the gist exactly. Any errors will be mine.

GoldenHind
12-24-2014, 10:39 PM
It should be pointed out that S389 is the same as L624, which has been found in two people who are otherwise classified as R1b-P312**. As they have a considerable GD, this appears to be an old subclade. Whether it falls directly below P312 or farther down the tree remains to be seen, but at the moment it is clearly a new subclade under P312.

And yes, these two posts should probably be transferred to the R1b-P312** thread, where there has already been some mention of this.

GTC
12-25-2014, 03:17 AM
Thread moved to P312 by request.

SearchSeeker
02-19-2015, 01:27 PM
Hi All,
Since the title of this thread is a question - S389+ Pictish? I wanted to answer the question. No, it isn't Pictish and it's great to see Wilson has a large number of followers posting this on several message boards over and over again. But anyway to answer the question again, No, it is not in any way associated with the Picts. Thank you and good day all.

castle3
02-20-2015, 04:06 PM
Hi All,
Since the title of this thread is a question - S389+ Pictish? I wanted to answer the question. No, it isn't Pictish and it's great to see Wilson has a large number of followers posting this on several message boards over and over again. But anyway to answer the question again, No, it is not in any way associated with the Picts. Thank you and good day all.

I'm pleased to receive any help from people who have studied genetics, plus have access to data which I don't. I'm quite content to keep my own counsel, but feel it important to share leads with any interested parties. You don't offer any explanation as to why you consider S389+ to be non-Pictish. I'd appreciate seeing any evidence you have to that effect. I can say that my Big Y results show some interesting links to north-east Scottish surnames, so I believe it's an avenue of research worth pursuing.

SearchSeeker
02-24-2015, 02:43 PM
Conversely, I'd like to see any evidence other than Wilson's wild speculation, but unfortunately there is none. In fact, it is his speculation that solely forms the basis for these unsubstantiated claims. There is no connection, and no one should have to disprove a "theory" that is solely based in speculation. It is not our job to disprove and untruth/falsehood, let's see some actual evidence that supports this. If they want to keep playing with their jars of wode, like dressing up for a fake holiday of halloween, that's fine, it's nice to have fantasies I guess to help with reality.

SearchSeeker
02-24-2015, 02:56 PM
On second thought, I just had a change of heart and thinking, if that groups wants to be "picts", that's fine, free speech and all, have at. I dub these picts. It could because easter is right around the corner, the whole eater bunny thing so please, no one throw out those jars of wode. Take care.

castle3
02-25-2015, 09:59 AM
Recent Big Y results are showing interesting links for a number of families to north-east Scotland. That alone makes it worth closely researching Pictish & pre-Pictish history in that region. I have no preference regarding a 'tribal' origin for my ancestors, merely seeking the truth. Over 40 years of research has led me to look at a variety of options, including: Anglo-Danish, Breton, Flemish, Brythonic Celt & others. I don't indulge in fantasy & 'wishful thinking', but endeavour to fully reference any finds. I consider it unwise not to seriously consider the views of someone, like Dr Wilson, who has studied genetics at a high level.
One of my reasons for posting was to enable anyone who has tested positive for S389/L624 to contact me & share results. I have taken the time & trouble to read the works of Cassius Dio, Gildas, Skene and more recent authors in order to gain an understanding of Pictish & pre-Pictish history. Anyone who has studied the above will know that the Picts' heartland was north of the Antonine Wall and east of the Mounth. Therefore, finding links to that region makes researching the Picts & their ancestors extremely worthwhile.
I'd continue, but I'm off to cover myself in blue paint & get some tattoos. If time permits, I'll venture out to my local Italian restaurant to complain about the Roman Legionnaires' devastation of Pictavia!

GoldenHind
02-25-2015, 07:42 PM
It seems to me that the debate about whether L624/S389 is Pictish or not only distracts from the important fact that it appears to constitute a new subclade under P312. L624 has been found in three people at FTDNA who have otherwise tested P312**, and under the name S389 in apparently over 30 samples at BritainsDNA. All three at FTDNA have at least Scottish surnames, and I gather the those at BritainsDNA are primarily of eastern Scottish origin. Personally I am not a fan of assigning ethnic classifications to ancient subclades, so I largely ignore the Pictish question.

The possibility that L624 may be downstream from another SNP which takes in an even larger group currently classified as P312** is now under investigation.

SearchSeeker
02-25-2015, 08:41 PM
Regarding what was posted, let's use me as an example, I may be good at engine work, but I'm not good with body work, but both are related to the automobile. Just because someone is good at discovering say snps, that does not mean they are good with assigning an origin to an snp, follow? The theory has no basis other than thus far it's mainly a group of guys with mostly (and not all by any stretch) Scottish names "somewhat" localized. That's it, that's the only evidence, it's pretty weak. Until an actual pict body is found with DNA that can be tested, it's not right for someone to be claiming they've discovered something but really have no proof at all. Just my opinion and every time I see this stuff re-posted from the same source, over and over again, it's actually a little sad. Anyway, take care all.

castle3
02-26-2015, 07:53 AM
To save this thread from getting bogged down, could anyone who is S389+/L624+ and who wishes to share information, please contact me via the Private Message service.

mcg11
02-26-2015, 02:58 PM
I am currently reading Dr. Benjamin Hudson’s book: The Picts. In this book he takes a European view of their origins. He does not discount a relationship to the Pictones in continental France.
. This suggests that they have the AMH (atlantic modal haplotype). This then makes it difficult to assign a specific SNP to those of Pictish origin in Scotland.
In looking at the DNA signatures of members of the various Scottish clans, there appear to be two major types: those with a 11/10 at 391/385a and those with a 11/11 at the same dys loci. This is not a fine discrimination because of the presence of Caledonian tribes in clan memberships.
In Clan Gregor, we have many such 11/11 haplotypes with surnames such as Gregory, Gregg, Grieg for example. I would assert that these partakers are of Pictish descent. JMHO

castle3
02-28-2015, 01:27 PM
That's not one I've read yet, mcg11. Does Dr Hudson mention a son of Nechtan called Eanruig or Henry? Interesting to note that he doesn't discount the old Pictones theory.