Interpret these results

[tamilgangster]

I got these results from one of Kenji Aryans posts.



M121305(Sankaran Muthusamy)

# Population Percent
1 S-Indian 68.57
2 Baloch 25.63
3 NE-Asian 2.63
4 SE-Asian 1.08
5 Papuan 0.97
6 Siberian 0.43
7 Caucasian 0.43
8 E-African 0.26

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 sakilli (chaubey) 2.17
2 tamil-vishwakarma (harappa) 2.3
3 madiga (reich) 2.56
4 ap-madiga (xing) 2.78
5 chamar (metspalu) 3.2
6 kamsali (reich) 3.36
7 bhil (reich) 3.75
8 hakkipikki (metspalu) 5.25
9 chenchu (metspalu) 5.5
10 tn-dalit (xing) 5.66
11 north-kannadi (chaubey) 5.73
12 kurumba (reich) 6.29
13 ap-mala (xing) 6.46
14 mala (reich) 6.54
15 vysya (reich) 7.14
16 hallaki (reich) 7.27
17 piramalai-kallar (metspalu) 7.31
18 singapore-indian-a (sgvp) 7.68
19 kol (metspalu) 8.22
20 naidu (reich) 8.93

ANE_K7

Population
ANE 26.99%
ASE 25.44%
WHG-UHG -
East_Eurasian 10.91%
West_African -
East_African 7.05%
ENF 29.61%



Compare to Piramalai kallar
S Indian 63%
Baloch 30%
Caucasian 2%
SE Asian 1%
NE Asian 1%
SW Asian 1%
Papuan 1%

ANE 30%
ASE 27%
E Asian 5%
E African 5%
ENF 32%

[tamilgangster]

Whats interesting about these results is that even though has a higher south Indian score than Piramalai kallar sample, he has lower ASE. He also has a lower ANE and ENF score as expected. But what is surprising though is that he has a higher east african and E eurasian score.