PDA

View Full Version : ydna predictor



vettor
01-15-2016, 10:18 PM
seems new

http://www.nevgen.org/

actually good compared to the older predictors

CelticGerman
01-15-2016, 11:22 PM
my result 7294

vettor
01-15-2016, 11:28 PM
my result 7294

Is it accurate ?

CelticGerman
01-15-2016, 11:33 PM
Is it accurate ?

yes, but I have heard from other people they have wrong results ....

vettor
01-15-2016, 11:51 PM
yes, but I have heard from other people they have wrong results ....

Mine gave me this

http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m153/vicpret/nevgen%20jan2016_zps9s9wnf3b.jpg (http://s103.photobucket.com/user/vicpret/media/nevgen%20jan2016_zps9s9wnf3b.jpg.html)

Correct for placing of position #1 ..........but I am much lower down the chain

position # 2 and 3 are from the other branch of T1a

what can one make with info from position 4, 5 and 6 ?

BTW position #8 is Oetzi line

gotten
01-16-2016, 12:33 AM
yes, but I have heard from other people they have wrong results ....

Might be due to an incomplete list of groups. If you start fitting a fixed and incomplete list of subbranches to somebody's STR results you'll end up with strange best fits.
I tested the STRs of my great uncle with this program. I suspect he is I1 or L22 at most but his best fit with high probability is I1-P109 which is oddly specific. His STRs with respect to the P109 modal are also oddly skewed to one side. To me this is indicative of a false best fit. The real best fit is probably hiding somewhere in an unfitted branch or maybe I'm overinterpreting.

Would be nice if a program like this had a relatively complete list of subbranches (down to a certain level) and a selectable level of how deep you would like the estimate to go (it only has two settings now).

Anyway, I like the website.

jesus
01-16-2016, 01:15 AM
Pretty accurate. 37 markers.

http://i.imgur.com/eesCWkb.png

MitchellSince1893
01-16-2016, 03:51 AM
Mine said 100% probability that I'm U152 at 111 markers.

VinceT
01-16-2016, 05:35 AM
99.5% probability that I'm R-L21, based on 111 markers.

Bzzzt-wrong.

http://www.anthrogenica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=7297&stc=1

firemonkey
01-16-2016, 06:41 AM
Got me as E-V13 at 111 markers but not my subclade of E-L17.

dp
01-16-2016, 05:41 PM
got me 63% as R1b-L21, which I am, but no further. I'm in L21>DF13>DF49>Z2980>Z2976>DF23>Z2961>ZZ30>ZP106xZP69
(NGS really increased haplogroup nomenclature)

I have upgrades pending on mom's 1st cousin's kit that generated:
1 R1b P312/S116* Western European 25.74 59.03
2 R1b Z2103>L584 22.16 59.48
3 R1b U106/S21 Proto-Germanic 17.53 58.72
4 R1b-L21 North Atlantic 14.99 56.98
5 R1b Z2103>Z2106 14.97 58.02
6 R1b U152/S28 Italo-Gaulish 4.51 55.74
7 R1b DF27/S250 Ibero-Atlantic 0.08 47.61

above chart not very compelling. Guess I'll have to wait for the chip test and rerun with the additional STR panel(s) to see if there is improvement in prediction.
dp :-)

Clinton P
01-17-2016, 12:20 AM
This is what I got....

7330

Clinton P

VinceT
01-17-2016, 04:25 AM
I tried two other 111 marker haplotypes:

Another confirmed R1b-U106>FGC396>L199.1 male was predicted 60.5% R1b P312/S116* Western European
A confirmed R1b-U106>FGC396>Z27230 male was predicted 87.7% R1b U152/S28 Italo-Gaulish

So maybe it's R-U106>FGC396 it's having trouble with? We're a rare bunch, and without a strong modal signature (which R-FGC396 doesn't really have despite an estimated 1,500 year bottleneck), haplotype convergence can be a real problem for predicting rare clades below R-L11.

Táltos
01-17-2016, 04:39 AM
I put my brother's 67 markers in and got 100% probability Q-L275. Which is correct, but obviously not going deep enough into Q1b.

Afshar
03-29-2016, 12:44 PM
Tried it, looks very nice, but unfortunately does not go further then Q-M25.

John Doe
03-29-2016, 01:32 PM
Predicted M123 as most likely, with a minor chance of V22 (which FTDNA predicted as negative). So I'd say it succeeded in predicting mine.

RobertCasey
03-29-2016, 01:52 PM
got me 63% as R1b-L21, which I am, but no further. I'm in L21>DF13>DF49>Z2980>Z2976>DF23>Z2961>ZZ30>ZP106xZP69
(NGS really increased haplogroup nomenclature)


Although my L21 predictor is dated, it still covers 50 % of L21 testers. There is a requirement to be known to be L21 positive to use this predictor. This predictor works only for YSNPs in the 800 to 2,400 year range where binary logistic regression is extremely accurate in predicting downstream YSNPs. If I had time, it could be expanded to predict 90 % of L21 (and other parts of R as well) in the time frame listed above (it takes a lot of analysis to predict each hapolgroup):

http://www.rcasey.net/DNA/R-L21_SNP_Predictor_Intro.html

(http://www.rcasey.net/DNA/R-L21_SNP_Predictor_Intro.html)

John Doe
03-31-2016, 02:27 PM
Can it go further downstream from say M123, to M34 for example?

John Doe
03-31-2016, 03:37 PM
Predicted M123 as most likely, with a minor chance of V22 (which FTDNA predicted as negative). So I'd say it succeeded in predicting mine.

Strange, now it seems to predict me most likely as being V22, and yet FTDNA predicts V22 as negative for me.

vettor
03-31-2016, 05:48 PM
Strange, now it seems to predict me most likely as being V22, and yet FTDNA predicts V22 as negative for me.

I do not know what you mean.........is the predictor updated? ....your post indicate only 1% of E-V22

as for my post#5 .............it is the same as then

100% L131
the next one is CTS11451 which is 0% and belongs to the L162 branch of T
and
the third is Y11151 which I am 0% and belongs to the branch of Iraqi, Kuwaiti and eastern saudi group

So the probability area is also required to be above zero

so to conclude it is accurate for me...........but then again the T marker is not that big

Abd.H
06-13-2016, 12:15 AM
my result according to this site is : J1a3-Z1828
9784

J1 DYS388=13
06-13-2016, 06:36 AM
Z1828 is native to just north of your area. Your branch CRS1460 is the most widespread branch under Z1828. http://genogenea.com/J-M267/tree

RobertCasey
06-13-2016, 06:46 PM
Try my L21 YSNP predictor. Even though it is out of date, it still predicts around 50 % of L21 submissions. I have since pulled data for all of R haplogroup and the prediction holds up for most R submissions as well - as long as the genetic distance is not extremely high (this also has an average of 99 % accuracy to date for L21 confirmed submissions):

http://www.rcasey.net/DNA/R-L21_SNP_Predictor_Intro.html