PDA

View Full Version : my GENO 2 NEXT GENERATION results



Darko
04-09-2016, 04:04 PM
I received my GENO 2 NEXT GENERATION results yesterday:

YDNA: RA1-M448 ( same as my results from FTDNA and britainsdna).

MTDNA: L2A1C (same as my result from britainsdna)

I have 0,30% Neanderthal dna

my Regional Ancestry:

-Western and Central Africa 37%
-Eastern Africa 22%
-Arabia 19%
- Northern Africa 14%
-Southern europe 5%
-Jewish Diaspora 4%

leo76
04-09-2016, 08:19 PM
So it looks like they got your haplogroups right. What about regional ancestry? Does that proportional breakdown look accurate to you?

Darko
04-09-2016, 09:59 PM
So it looks like they got your haplogroups right. What about regional ancestry? Does that proportional breakdown look accurate to you?

not exactly, they mentioned in the main page that I am R1A1-M448 which is correct but when I enter to my Y Dna deep ancestry I found that they mentioned that my last snp is M417 which is totally wrong, things get more worst after I have transfered my results to my ftdna account my Y DNA has changed to a wrong haplogroup and my mtdna result ( for which I did this test) has not appeared in my ftdna account and for these reasons I have asked FTDNA to cancel my transfer, I hope that they accept my request.

my Regional Ancestry is close to my family finder result except my 04% jewish diaspora which is a surprise for me because, as far as I know, I do not have Jewish ancestors also my family finder and my autosomal results from britainsdna don't show any jewish diaspora percentage

kingjohn
06-19-2016, 09:27 AM
in your case the jewish diaspora is false
as you can see this bad point in geno2 next generation
all those european population have jewish disapora lol :)
https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/reference-populations-next-gen/
regards
adam
p.s
what is intresting for me is that are aschenazi refrence in end of the page carry 5% eastern europe
and a little question
from other north africans who tested by geno2next generation is the neaderthal score was 0.3% like you ?
or there results higher ?

tmd
06-20-2016, 10:36 PM
9879

According to geno, I am 0,1 neanderthal

wombatofthenorth
06-20-2016, 11:18 PM
in your case the jewish diaspora is false
as you can see this bad point in geno2 next generation
all those european population have jewish disapora lol :)
https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/reference-populations-next-gen/
regards
adam
p.s
what is intresting for me is that are aschenazi refrence in end of the page carry 5% eastern europe
and a little question
from other north africans who tested by geno2next generation is the neaderthal score was 0.3% like you ?
or there results higher ?

Those are just the averages for their reference sample sets collected from each region. It's not crazy to think that if you test say 20 people from each of those regions that you might end up with a few % Ashkenazi as an average even if many will get 0%. And just the same it's not crazy to think Ashkenazi reference might average 5% EE as I'm sure some who thought they were fully Ashkenazi had an ancestor who was not mixed in.

wombatofthenorth
06-20-2016, 11:20 PM
9879

According to geno, I am 0,1 neanderthal

Nice. I was becoming afraid every single person who took it got 1.1% or 1.2% (so far I had only seen some Northern European/Northeast European results) so good to see it does hit other numbers like 0.3% and 0.1%.

XooR
07-07-2016, 08:10 PM
Just a quick question, I did see Geno 2 Georgian reference results before as below

10249
https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/reference-populations/

but recently one of my friend did geno 2 test and received below results and as I see Georgian reference results has changed? Considering my friend is Laz he supposed to get results similar to Georgian but in this case he has 100% Asia Minor, do you guys think it is normal?
10250
10251
10252

Kurd
07-08-2016, 01:30 AM
Just a quick question, I did see Geno 2 Georgian reference results before as below

http://www.anthrogenica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=10249&stc=1
https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/reference-populations/

but recently one of my friend did geno 2 test and received below results and as I see Georgian reference results has changed? Considering my friend is Laz he supposed to get results similar to Georgian but in this case he has 100% Asia Minor, do you guys think it is normal?
http://www.anthrogenica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=10250&stc=1
http://www.anthrogenica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=10251&stc=1
http://www.anthrogenica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=10252&stc=1

According to your post your friend and the Georgian reference are about 77% similar. Also, if your Laz friend's result shows 100% Asia Minor, it does not mean that he scores 0 in all the other categories; SC Asian, Arabian, etc. It just means that he is very similar to their Asia Minor reference. Unfortunately, reference results are not very informative with regards to the breakdown of other components.

For comparison, here are the results of one of the Iraqi Kurd samples I manage. His 1st reference is Georgian. His main difference with Georgian is that he does not score any S European, and he has about twice as much Arabian and 3 times as much SC Asian as Georgian. His 2nd reference is also N Caucausus.

http://www.anthrogenica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=10255&stc=1

wombatofthenorth
07-11-2016, 05:33 AM
Just a quick question, I did see Geno 2 Georgian reference results before as below

but recently one of my friend did geno 2 test and received below results and as I see Georgian reference results has changed? Considering my friend is Laz he supposed to get results similar to Georgian but in this case he has 100% Asia Minor, do you guys think it is normal?


You are making a mistake in comparing Geno 2.0 reference population results with Geno 2.0 NG results. Geno 2.0 and Geno 2.0 NG are not the same thing.