PDA

View Full Version : similar STR with different Haplogroup B and J



Smilelover
10-27-2016, 03:05 PM
i found something which i couldnt understand .. if someone help me please

in one project i notice someone from haplogroup J grouped with B-M181 persons
i see that he is very similar to haplogroup B STR .. but his SNP testing show him as J-Z599
any explanation for this ??



M7129 B-M181 14 24 15 10 12-12 11 10 13 13 11 32 16 7-8 10 11 26 15 19 33 15-15-17-17 12 10 21-22 13 13 19 17 34-35 8 10 11 8 16-16 8 11 10 8 9 10 0 19-20 16 10 11 14 17 8 10 24 21 15 13 11 14 10 12 11 11 34 17 8 16 12 22 27 21 13 13 12 12 12 9 11 13 10 13 12 29 12 13 21 16 11 11 21 15 18 16 24 12 12 15 25 14 16 19 14 15 17 9 12 11


M8844 J-Z599 14 24 15 10 12-12 11 10 13 13 11 32 17 7-8 10 11 26 15 19 33 15-15-17-17 11 10 21-22 12 13 18 17 35-36 8 10 11 8 16-16 8 11 10 8 9 10 0 19-20 16 10 11 14 17 8 10 24 21 15 13 11 14 10 12 11 11 33 17 8 16 12 22 27 21 13 13 12 12 12 9 11 13 10 13 12 29 12 13 21 16 11 11 21 15 19 15 24 12 12 15 25 14 16 19 14 15 17 9 12 11

Afshar
10-27-2016, 05:29 PM
That is why str based hg predictions are not the most accurate ones, especially with low markers.

Smilelover
10-27-2016, 07:35 PM
Whats intersting is that this is not low STR markers
They are 111 markers and 9 g.d at 111 if i am not mistaken so they are a match based on STR
I cannot understand how they are in different haplogroups

RCO
10-27-2016, 11:56 PM
Could you tell the name of the Projects and the FTDNA numbers ?

Smilelover
10-28-2016, 03:47 AM
The project name Alarab
https://www.familytreedna.com/public/Alarab/default.aspx?section=yresults

The FTDNA number is already in the codes upove
M7129
M8844

RCO
10-28-2016, 10:54 AM
As always FTDNA is making confusion with some recurrent SNPs. They are both haplogroup B but M8844 is also Z599+, so there's an error in the classification there.

Smilelover
10-28-2016, 02:49 PM
As always FTDNA is making confusion with some recurrent SNPs. They are both haplogroup B but M8844 is also Z599+, so there's an error in the classification there.

Thank you. That's make sense