DNA.Land from 23andme/Ancestry/FTDNA kits

[JFWinstone]

I have DNA.Land from my three different kits plus mum's AncestryDNA. The FTDNA one seems like the anomaly of the bunch. :crazy:

23andme

13869

Ancestry

13870

FTDNA

13871

Mum Ancestry

13872

[JFWinstone]

Mum FTDNA

14349
14350
14351

[lilac9]

I have noticed that 23andme raw data seems to find more Senegal River while Ancestry raw data finds more Lower Niger River Valley. I'm not a fan of DNA.land. On Ancestry.com I match Senegal the most but when I uploaded my Ancestry raw data to DNA.land I matched Lower Niger Valley the most which on Ancestry I get less than one percent Nigeria. It makes identifying where my African comes from very difficult.

[Maquiladora]

That makes a lot more sense. My FTDNA results in DNALand were sooo inaccurate.

[greerpalmer]

Pretty big difference between 23andme and ancestry.com. Ancestry was not able to differentiate much. Based on my parents familytreeDNA results, and my paid service results, I expect a lot is missing.
http://www.anthrogenica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=17747&d=1500996376