Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: LivingDNA added to the ISOGG Y-SNP testing comparison chart:

  1. #11
    Registered Users
    Posts
    4,010
    Sex
    Y-DNA (P)
    R1b
    mtDNA (M)
    H

    There are a number of items on that chart that are out of date or not displayed in context. This is one of the problems with these kinds of things - it's hard to keep them updated accurately and even harder to make everything apples to apples because it is not. Add the complexities to the lack of currency and the usefulness isn't what is hoped for.

    I must be feeling mischievous today so I guess I'll say it. I appreciate the effort but apparently not many testers are paying attention. I apologize as that has to offend someone but I think it is true. I've had too many years in competitive endeavors and things that are not working or are waste of time are often cut because they should be.
    Last edited by Mikewww; 10-18-2017 at 01:13 PM.

  2. #12
    Registered Users
    Posts
    206
    Sex
    Location
    England
    Nationality
    British
    Y-DNA (P)
    R1b-U106+ Z12+ (Dad)
    mtDNA (M)
    U4c1a

    England
    I've now updated the price of the YElite 2.1 test on the SNP testing chart and on the other two affected Wiki pages (the mtDNA testing comparison chart and the next generation sequencing chart). We updated the price on on the Full Genomes page on 3rd August to $695 so it must have been reduced again some time after that date. FGC normally write to advise us of any price changes but that didn't happen on this occasion though fortunately someone did e-mail us.

    It is free to set up a Wiki account so if there are changes that need to be made to any pages the quickest solution is to edit the page directly which cuts out the middle man.

    The intention was to revamp the SNP testing chart to compare companies rather than tests as the chart is not sustainable in its present format. Unfortunately my request for assistance in the ISOGG Project Admins group resulted in a zero response rate. If anyone else is able to help format a new chart it would be much appreciated. Otherwise I'll have a go when I have a bit more free time.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. how accurate is this tree chart?
    By afbarwaaqo in forum Autosomal (auDNA)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-06-2019, 06:41 AM
  2. ISOGG chart
    By Davpla in forum General
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-26-2017, 12:16 AM
  3. LivingDNA and Ancestry comparison
    By JGG in forum Living DNA
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-31-2017, 02:49 PM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-20-2017, 04:24 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-30-2014, 04:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •