Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Behind the scenes at a DNA testing company

  1. #1
    Registered Users
    Posts
    489
    Sex
    Location
    USA
    Nationality
    USA
    Y-DNA (P)
    R-U152
    mtDNA (M)
    H2a2a1

    Canada Quebec United Kingdom Ireland Finland

    Behind the scenes at a DNA testing company

    Just read an interesting article about someone's experience working at one of the bigger names in DNA testing. http://www.cracked.com/personal-expe...companies.html

    The first part about accuracy of the tests is no surprise to anyone on this forum, I'd imagine. But I never thought they'd have to worry about people actually showing up at their doorstep fuming about their results. Very interesting read.

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to therrien.joel For This Useful Post:

     A Norfolk L-M20 (12-08-2017),  laulei (12-08-2017),  MitchellSince1893 (12-08-2017),  Nive1526 (12-08-2017),  Robert1 (12-10-2017),  tomz (12-09-2017)

  3. #2
    Registered Users
    Posts
    4,210
    Sex
    Location
    Tierra de Ayllon
    Y-DNA (P)
    U152>L2>Z49>Z142>
    mtDNA (M)
    H1bt
    Y-DNA (M)
    I2a2a1b2a1b1>Y4925
    mtDNA (P)
    H37

    England Scotland Wales Germany Ireland Sweden Finns
    I thought this quote was informative
    "If you get a high percentage, it's a safe bet that you have ancestors from there. I'm talking about a 50-60 percent on your test. Anything lower, and take it with a grain of salt."
    and this one
    "One woman sent the packet out with green shamrocks and a green leprechaun hat on it. She was really proud to be Irish. She even said she was excited to see if she was 100 percent Irish. But the test found no Irish blood. It was half Eastern Europe, then a mix of different places in Germany and Italy, and even Greece." Clearly, this woman's family had either lied to her, been lied to themselves, or she was one of those stealth adoptions that happen every so often. "The consensus was that she would send a huge fit if she was shown not to be Irish at all, so we made her 20 percent Irish and highlighted our disclaimer about results not being accurate."
    Last edited by MitchellSince1893; 12-08-2017 at 03:44 AM.
    Y DNA line continued: Z142>Z12222>FGC12378>FGC12401>FGC12384
    37% English, 26% Scot/Ulster Scot, 14% Welsh, 14% German, 3% Ireland, 3% Nordic, 2% French/Dutch, 1% India
    Hidden Content

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MitchellSince1893 For This Useful Post:

     A Norfolk L-M20 (12-08-2017),  Robert1 (12-10-2017)

  5. #3
    Administrator
    Posts
    2,348
    Sex
    Y-DNA (P)
    DF27
    mtDNA (M)
    V33

    New Zealand Croatia Star of David Ireland Scotland Poland
    This has some of the funniest stuff I've heard all week (not including going to the office to threaten). I can't believe someone would take it that seriously.
    Ancestry on paper: English, Scottish, Irish, Welsh, Croatian, Ashkenazi, Polish and Māori.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to BalkanKiwi For This Useful Post:

     Afshar (12-09-2017)

  7. #4
    Gold Class Member
    Posts
    2,718
    Sex

    We can't be sure that the article is factual because Cracked specifically admits that some of its material is fiction or semifiction. But if the article is an accurate account, we need to say the obvious: That specific testing company is committing fraud, by any reasonable definition of the term. People who pay good money for a DNA test advertised as scientific, expect results based on science, not cowardice or spite.

    The article makes clear that these swindlers use "spit" (saliva) rather than a cheek swab. Thus, the company is not Family Tree DNA, obviously.

  8. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to lgmayka For This Useful Post:

     BalkanKiwi (12-08-2017),  Jean M (12-11-2017),  kostoffj (12-11-2017),  Nibelung (12-08-2017),  tomz (12-09-2017)

  9. #5
    Registered Users
    Posts
    489
    Sex
    Location
    USA
    Nationality
    USA
    Y-DNA (P)
    R-U152
    mtDNA (M)
    H2a2a1

    Canada Quebec United Kingdom Ireland Finland
    Quote Originally Posted by lgmayka View Post
    We can't be sure that the article is factual because Cracked specifically admits that some of its material is fiction or semifiction. But if the article is an accurate account, we need to say the obvious: That specific testing company is committing fraud, by any reasonable definition of the term. People who pay good money for a DNA test advertised as scientific, expect results based on science, not cowardice or spite.

    The article makes clear that these swindlers use "spit" (saliva) rather than a cheek swab. Thus, the company is not Family Tree DNA, obviously.
    Cracked typically makes it quite clear what is fiction/semifiction, so I would say this is probably a true account.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to therrien.joel For This Useful Post:

     tomz (12-09-2017)

  11. #6
    Registered Users
    Posts
    452
    Sex

    Under most personal information laws, if you have evidence (Including family stories etc.) that your personal information on a site is wrong, they need to change it. So I don't think that changing people's ethnic break-down by demand is wrong per se, as long as it's not used for research, and the person in question knows exactly what they did. Also this would be understandable, even commendable in case that a biogegraphical analysis showed someone had 10% of British or German, but they had genealogical evidence they had a fully British grandfather. However, big DNA-testing companies *do not have time* to personally customize each customers results individually. Which brings us to the main point, that the article is completely made up and supposed to be funny, I guess.

    Case in point, the prospective whistleblower recounts how he was there for their internal tests on the ancestry analysis, but then few paragraphs down recounts how he wasn't yet working there when a customer angry about their ancestry analysis results came in. And even if someone's teeth were really breaking off pieces for months on an end, and any of the major testing companies actually kept re-sending new kits for that long, the teeth are just calcium. It does nothing to DNA analysis, and gets filtered out anyway. Swigging a chug of Listerine, as the supposed DNA-testing company employee says you're *supposed* to do, would just wash out any DNA-containing leukocytes and epithelial cells in the mouth and potentially mess up with the DNA testing chemistry. More importantly, this is not the recommended testing practice at any company I have heard of. Not only isn't the "whistleblower" a DNA-company employee, but he clearly knows nothing about DNA-testing to the point of probably never having taken one.

    But then, it's a satire/humor magazine. More insidious is the article's contention that DNA-testing companies are part of a conspiracy to mess up with people who oppose multiculturalism, and make people look more multicultural in general.

  12. #7
    Registered Users
    Posts
    491
    Sex
    mtDNA (M)
    H

    Ukraine
    This article is clearly a joke, but in every joke there is some truth. I wonder myself if DNA testing companies modify results depending on location and names of customers. It would be fraud, but I think it's possible.

  13. #8
    Registered Users
    Posts
    327
    Sex
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Ethnicity
    White European
    Nationality
    USA
    Y-DNA (P)
    I-M223
    mtDNA (M)
    T2b

    England Scotland Germany Switzerland Italy Norway
    I'll be the first to admit ethnicity reports are only estimates which vary depending on the company/calculator. But this article is very misleading.

    "But when Inside Edition had a set of triplets send their spit in to Ancestry.com and 23andMe, they got wildly different results from both services. Neither gave each triplet the same ancestry results -- which, considering they all came from the same womb, is pretty weird."

    The fact that they came from the same womb does not mean they should have exact same results. It's the fact that they are identical twins that means they should all have the exact same DNA, and therefore their results from the same company shouldn't vary. But they neglect to say their results from the same company only vary by 1-2% IIRC, which is fairly negligible, if you ask me, and I wonder if it maybe has to do with the lab testing and raw data (maybe one or two of the triplets was missing an SNP here or there during the chip's extraction?).

    They claim: "Inside Edition found differences of over 10 percent between the triplets they tested." - maybe between the two companies - but I distinctly remember checking into this and the differences between the triplets from AncestryDNA was only 1-2%. This is misleading at best, and just a lie at worst.

    It goes on to say:

    "Some companies may use 12, 37, or 67, while others claim to use more than 700,000 different markers."

    Those are different types of DNA. 12, 37, and 67 is Y-DNA, 700,000 is autosomal DNA. They are not comparable, and Y-DNA doesn't produce an ethnicity report. Did the author of this even do ANY research before writing it? Internet journalism is such a joke.

    I'm not even going to bother reading the rest.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to RobinBMc For This Useful Post:

     Saetro (12-11-2017)

  15. #9
    Registered Users
    Posts
    452
    Sex

    Inside Edition is similar category to Cracked, being the original example of Tabloid Journalism. They manufacture reports for controversy, not for fair and accurate reporting. In their response that other media (But not Inside Edition who naturally left that part out) printed, 23andMe in particular responded that they believed Inside Edition compared the triplets using different confidence levels (23andMe allows you to use one of three confidence levels, which generally change how much of the percentages are assigned into "broadly" instead of specific categories). Due to privacy issues, 23andMe clearly can't state whether or not the triplets did have similar results or not.
    At least the Admixture style analysis used by FTDNA and AncestryDNA, I believe, includes a stochastic component where the algorithm is run intentionally with a few different random variations with the intent of finding average results that are robust against small errors in genotyping and population data. This can lead to slightly different results from the same data, though obviously the very intent is to get same data from different runs. Inside Edition quoted FTDNA as saying "Family Tree DNA told Inside Edition they have improved their algorithm and will implement a new method in the next few weeks" so at least according to Inside Edition, FTDNA did admit they at least had a problem. No idea about AncestryDNA's response.

    Though again, more to the point, I couldn't find a single verifiable statement in the Cracked article that checked out. "considering they all came from the same womb, is pretty weird" reflects a common misunderstanding between genetic and genealogical ancestry, however, and it seems to be the article writers own contribution rather than the alleged DNA-company whistleblower's, so I'm willing to give it a pass as far as the intent is concerned. Incredibly, the author seems to accidentally get it essentially "right" in this case as well since they were identical twins, not because they came from the same womb. (Interestingly, it would be possible for the algorithms to detect for example that three people are siblings, use them to construct a model for their parents, and give each one the same ancestry breakdown based on that model. I hope to see this in the near future, and 23andMe already uses phasing when parent is available, though it will muddle the line between genetic and genealogical ancestry.)

    So if you were a DNA-company employee intending to whistleblow about abuses within the industry, would you pick a failing (they laid off majority of their employees this month) MAD-magazine spin-off satire site like Cracked.com to spill the beans, or would you sell the story to any number of investigative rags willing to pay big money for it instead of the $50 Cracked.com reportedly pays to the author (not the supposed whistleblower)?
    The question is rhetorical, of course, since Cracked.com makes no secret it's a comedy site ("America's Only Humor Site: A funny website filled with funny videos, pics, articles, and a whole bunch of other funny stuff." their front-page proudly declares), that publishes mainly lies (https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/5...s-full-of-lies - yes, yes, I get that article in itself is party satirical). Unfortunately, you've still got the "Okay, so the article is full of lies and incorrect information, but... I want it to be true, so it must be at least partly true!" folks. This is how myths get started, people, and then you've got people still insisting the Earth is flat because they room-mates father's buddy once read this article about it...

    Simple reality check: As I said, companies that are testing MILLIONS of people don't have time or manpower to customize reports for everybody. If you used a hour to dig into the (usually unavailable) background of a million people each, you'd need 500 man-work-years. AncestryDNA was at about 5 million and sold 1.5 million additional kits during Black Friday so a rough estimate of 3250 man-work-years *each and every time* they update their ancestry-estimates algorithm. Even if you argue it could be done in half a hour or less, they would be hiring tens of thousands of people to get it done in reasonable time, and somebody else than Cracked.com would take notice. And yet the biggest if not only complaint people have about DNA testing is the ancestry results don't match their expectations. Which gets us to the final point, that since the DNA-companies don't know each individuals expectations (beyond that they expect to get information that helps them identify ancestors, and preferably a Native American or two), it would be pointless for them to change them.

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Donwulff For This Useful Post:

     Jean M (12-11-2017),  lgmayka (12-09-2017),  Nibelung (12-10-2017)

  17. #10
    Gold Class Member
    Posts
    2,718
    Sex

    Quote Originally Posted by Donwulff View Post
    Unfortunately, you've still got the "Okay, so the article is full of lies and incorrect information, but... I want it to be true, so it must be at least partly true!" folks.
    You bring up an important point.

    Truly professional liars--employed by a satire magazine, a supermarket tabloid, a government's secret agency, etc.--do not merely spit out a pack of 100% lies. That's too obvious. Truly professional prevarication requires an interleaved mixture of truth and falsehood, woven so as to be at least superficially plausible and, more important, difficult to disprove. Anonymous unverifiable sources are a standard technique, as are detailed, somewhat humorous anecdotes to give the reader that I'm-just-an-ordinary-guy feeling.

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lgmayka For This Useful Post:

     kostoffj (12-11-2017),  Nibelung (12-10-2017)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-20-2020, 02:47 AM
  2. Are there any DNA testing company with shipment for Iran?
    By Kargar in forum Inquiries Corner
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-09-2018, 07:13 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-07-2018, 10:24 PM
  4. Best company for testing
    By tahir0010 in forum Other
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-28-2017, 08:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •