Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Atacama skeleton MtDNA Results

  1. #11
    Registered Users
    Posts
    2,461
    Sex

    Quote Originally Posted by Pamir View Post
    Autosomal DNA of Atacama skeleton, Chile

    Gedmatch: Z449559 Gedmatch genesis: HJ4686698

    I am owner of kits.
    Were you able to extract the mtDNA?

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to ArmandoR1b For This Useful Post:

     [email protected] (07-03-2018)

  3. #12
    Registered Users
    Posts
    1,044
    Sex
    Location
    South Wales
    Ethnicity
    Mostly Welsh,+ flags
    Nationality
    British
    Y-DNA (P)
    R1a- Z283 - Y128147
    mtDNA (M)
    J2a1a1a

    Wales Scotland Ireland Cornwall United Kingdom
    Seems to be a high North Atlantic and West Med, for a Native American?
    Native woman with Northern Spanish father?


    Eurogenes K13 4-Ancestors Oracle

    This program is based on 4-Ancestors Oracle Version 0.96 by Alexandr Burnashev.
    Questions about results should be sent to him at: [email protected]
    Original concept proposed by Sergey Kozlov.
    Many thanks to Alexandr for helping us get this web version developed.

    K13 Oracle ref data revised 21 Nov 2013

    Admix Results (sorted):

    # Population Percent
    1 Amerindian 49.20
    2 North_Atlantic 17.70
    3 West_Med 16.42
    4 East_Med 4.96
    5 Baltic 4.30
    6 West_Asian 3.18
    7 Red_Sea 3.00
    Gedmatch
    Kit Num: M129412, QA3736362
    23andme
    Hidden Content
    LivingDNA
    Hidden Content

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to [email protected] For This Useful Post:

     palamede (07-06-2018)

  5. #13
    Banned
    Posts
    6,336
    Sex
    Location
    Torun
    Ethnicity
    Central 75% + 25% Mazovia
    Nationality
    Pole
    Y-DNA (P)
    R1a > M198 > YP 1337

    Poland
    Quote Originally Posted by Pamir View Post
    Autosomal DNA of Atacama skeleton, Chile

    Gedmatch: Z449559 Gedmatch genesis: HJ4686698

    I am owner of kits.

    And this is K47 calculator by LukaszM
    25.02% Andean
    13.95% Meso-Amerind
    11.33% North-Iberian
    5.36% Scando-Germanic
    5.02% Amazonian
    4.37% Celtic
    4.35% West-Med
    4.21% East-Med
    4.07% North-Amerind
    3.41% East-Euro
    3.12% North-African
    2.64% Arabic
    2.55% East-Iberian
    2.25% Volgan
    1.43% West-Finnic
    1.40% Paleo-Balkan
    1.28% Baltic
    1.00% North-Sea_Germanic
    0.99% South-Caucasian
    0.73% Malay
    0.47% Pamirian
    0.45% Omotic
    0.44% Iranian
    0.16% Uralic
    0.01% Central-Med
    0.01% North-Caucasian
    Ignoring skeleton (hmm) it's pretty much typical mestizo autosomally.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to lukaszM For This Useful Post:

     bmoney (07-19-2018)

  7. #14
    The wet dream of all Stormfags out there, “MUH WHITE GODS”, is, in my opinion, almost definitely true to some extent. Perhaps this is some evidence of this - we’ve already seen evidence from DNA analysis of the Chinchorro mummies. I wonder whether this information will be kept under wraps, but to anybody with Google and the will to learn, the conclusion is obvious. Swastikas and naturally light-haired mummies don’t end up in the Americas by sheer coincidence...

  8. #15
    Registered Users
    Posts
    48
    Sex
    Ethnicity
    Chechen/Noahchi/Nakh
    Y-DNA (P)
    L1a2 (m357, L1c, L3)

    Quote Originally Posted by ArmandoR1b View Post
    Were you able to extract the mtDNA?
    Yes, there was a text file, it said B2. I have deleted everything except filtered autosomal data, because bamfile was 50gb, and her whole genome file was 2 or 3 times bigger, i just dont have so much space on my drive to store everything.

  9. #16
    Banned
    Posts
    6,336
    Sex
    Location
    Torun
    Ethnicity
    Central 75% + 25% Mazovia
    Nationality
    Pole
    Y-DNA (P)
    R1a > M198 > YP 1337

    Poland
    Quote Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
    The wet dream of all Stormfags out there, “MUH WHITE GODS”, is, in my opinion, almost definitely true to some extent. Perhaps this is some evidence of this - we’ve already seen evidence from DNA analysis of the Chinchorro mummies. I wonder whether this information will be kept under wraps, but to anybody with Google and the will to learn, the conclusion is obvious. Swastikas and naturally light-haired mummies don’t end up in the Americas by sheer coincidence...
    Atacama mummy is said to be from XX century... It was just monstrous fetus, left and naturally mummified on desert.

  10. #17
    Registered Users
    Posts
    233
    Sex

    I am a bit surprised by the almost exactly 50% Amerindian, which would suggest that the mother was 100% native South American and the father 100% European.
    But the small and mixed segments in the chromosome painting does not look like recent admixture, is the 50/50 ratio just by chance?

  11. #18
    Registered Users
    Posts
    48
    Sex
    Ethnicity
    Chechen/Noahchi/Nakh
    Y-DNA (P)
    L1a2 (m357, L1c, L3)

    Faulty science and ethics cited in DNA analyzes of Atacama mummy

    As experts in human anatomy and skeletal development, the Otago-led research team found no evidence for any of the skeletal anomalies reported by the Stanford researchers. All the abnormal characteristics cited by the Stanford researchers are part of normal skeletal development of a fetus, the Otago-led research team say.

    "Unfortunately, there was no scientific rationale to undertake genomic analyses of Ata because the skeleton is normal, the identified genetic mutations are possibly coincidental, and none of the genetic mutations are known to be strongly associated with skeletal pathology that would affect the skeleton at this young age," Associate Professor Halcrow says.
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0718104811.htm

  12. #19
    Registered Users
    Posts
    48
    Sex
    Ethnicity
    Chechen/Noahchi/Nakh
    Y-DNA (P)
    L1a2 (m357, L1c, L3)

    Quote Originally Posted by Nive1526 View Post
    I am a bit surprised by the almost exactly 50% Amerindian, which would suggest that the mother was 100% native South American and the father 100% European.
    But the small and mixed segments in the chromosome painting does not look like recent admixture, is the 50/50 ratio just by chance?
    I have autosomal dna results of 15000 and 5000 y. old bones from southern Spain and Morocco, they have scando-german admix, (i use Lucaszs K47 calculator), so it means that Spanish colonists brought that admix to chile. This is all i can say.

  13. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RasulSrg For This Useful Post:

     lukaszM (07-19-2018),  Nive1526 (07-19-2018),  [email protected] (07-19-2018)

  14. #20
    Gold Class Member
    Posts
    4,510
    Location
    Shangri La

    Afghanistan Jammu and Kashmir United States of America Canada
    Its nothing more than a result of a Mesoamerican mother and a Conquistador Father, proof is in the pudding.

    Admix Results (sorted):

    # Population Percent
    1 American 49.34
    2 Mediterranean 19.69
    3 NE-Euro 15.14
    4 Caucasian 7.65
    5 SW-Asian 3.5
    6 Baloch 2.6
    7 Beringian 0.69
    8 W-African 0.52
    9 SE-Asian 0.46
    10 Papuan 0.32
    11 Siberian 0.09

    Single Population Sharing:

    # Population (source) Distance
    1 mexican (1000genomes) 5.46
    2 ecuadorian (bryc) 6.12
    3 colombian (bryc) 20.17
    4 colombian (1000genomes) 28.11
    5 peruvian (1000genomes) 34.54
    6 puerto-rican (1000genomes) 41.99
    7 puerto-rican (bryc) 42.32
    8 maya (hgdp) 47.84
    9 bolivian (xing) 47.89
    10 totonac (xing) 53.97
    11 pima (hgdp) 54.65
    12 tuscan (hgdp) 57.78
    13 tuscan (1000genomes) 57.92
    14 tuscan (hapmap) 57.94
    15 italian (hgdp) 58.01
    16 romanian-a (behar) 58.29
    17 ashkenazi (harappa) 58.51
    18 dominican (bryc) 58.61
    19 ashkenazy-jew (behar) 58.78
    20 bulgarian (yunusbayev) 58.89

    Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

    # Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
    1 62.7% peruvian (1000genomes) + 37.3% italian (hgdp) @ 2.54
    2 54.8% maya (hgdp) + 45.2% italian (hgdp) @ 2.83
    3 54.8% bolivian (xing) + 45.2% italian (hgdp) @ 3.08
    4 55.4% maya (hgdp) + 44.6% spaniard (behar) @ 3.09
    5 52.4% totonac (xing) + 47.6% spaniard (behar) @ 3.14

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to pegasus For This Useful Post:

     drobbah (07-22-2018)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. How far do your mtDna results go ?
    By Geborgenheit in forum Other
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 10-09-2020, 05:04 AM
  2. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-04-2018, 05:42 PM
  3. Comparison of v4 and v5 mtDNA results
    By Petr in forum 23andMe
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-20-2017, 11:54 PM
  4. FTDNA mtdna results
    By jortita in forum FTDNA
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-24-2016, 12:20 PM
  5. different companies different mtDNA results
    By Giovanni Ca in forum FTDNA
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-22-2015, 06:41 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •