Mesolithic Polish Hunter-Gatherer

[Tomenable]

This sample is from the study Fernandes et al. 2018:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-33067-w

See also: https://anthrogenica.com/showthread....hbouring-areas

Genesis Kit Number: XM9113846
Name: N22 Poland Hunter-Gatherer

Similarity map:

Interesting that similarity to northern Poles (even northern Western Poles) is higher than to Belarusians:
(Kashubia 73, Wielkopolska 70, Mazovia 70, Suwalki 72, Lithuania 75, Latvia 74, Estonia 84, and so on)





Eurogenes K15:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 Baltic 36.68
2 North_Sea 34.81
3 Eastern_Euro 16.84
4 Atlantic 11.67

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Estonian 11.11
2 Lithuanian 13.77
3 Belorussian 15.73
4 Ukrainian 15.97
5 Polish 16.01
6 Finnish 16.02
7 Ukrainian_Lviv 16.16
8 South_Polish 16.7
9 Estonian_Polish 17.05
10 Southwest_Russian 17.27
11 Russian_Smolensk 17.72
12 Ukrainian_Belgorod 17.92
13 Southwest_Finnish 17.99
14 East_Finnish 18.61
15 La_Brana-1 20.06
16 Kargopol_Russian 20.13
17 North_Swedish 20.64
18 Erzya 21.39
19 Hungarian 21.64
20 Swedish 22.34

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 96.8% Estonian + 3.2% Swedish @ 11.09
2 98.3% Estonian + 1.7% West_Norwegian @ 11.1
3 100% Estonian + 0% Abhkasian @ 11.11
4 100% Estonian + 0% Adygei @ 11.11
5 100% Estonian + 0% Afghan_Hazara @ 11.11
6 100% Estonian + 0% Afghan_Pashtun @ 11.11
7 100% Estonian + 0% Afghan_Tadjik @ 11.11
8 100% Estonian + 0% Afghan_Turkmen @ 11.11
9 100% Estonian + 0% Afghan_Uzbeki @ 11.11
10 100% Estonian + 0% Algerian @ 11.11
11 100% Estonian + 0% Algerian_Jewish @ 11.11
12 100% Estonian + 0% Altaian @ 11.11
13 100% Estonian + 0% Anzick-1 @ 11.11
14 100% Estonian + 0% Armenian @ 11.11
15 100% Estonian + 0% Ashkenazi @ 11.11
16 100% Estonian + 0% Assyrian @ 11.11
17 100% Estonian + 0% Austrian @ 11.11
18 100% Estonian + 0% Austroasiatic_Ho @ 11.11
19 100% Estonian + 0% Azeri @ 11.11
20 100% Estonian + 0% Balkar @ 11.11

Eurogenes K13:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 Baltic 61.09
2 North_Atlantic 38.24
3 Oceanian 0.67

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Lithuanian 12.85
2 Estonian 12.88
3 Finnish 14.84
4 East_Finnish 15.72
5 Belorussian 15.72
6 Estonian_Polish 16.98
7 Russian_Smolensk 17.45
8 Southwest_Finnish 17.77
9 Polish 19
10 La_Brana-1 19.4
11 Kargopol_Russian 19.68
12 Southwest_Russian 19.76
13 Ukrainian_Belgorod 19.99
14 Erzya 21.22
15 South_Polish 22.15
16 Ukrainian 22.31
17 Ukrainian_Lviv 23.68
18 North_Swedish 24.02
19 Croatian 29.48
20 Swedish 29.64

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 81.5% Lithuanian + 18.5% La_Brana-1 @ 12.4
2 51.2% Lithuanian + 48.8% Estonian @ 12.55
3 78.7% Lithuanian + 21.3% Finnish @ 12.68
4 92.6% Lithuanian + 7.4% Southwest_Finnish @ 12.82
5 94.2% Lithuanian + 5.8% East_Finnish @ 12.84
6 97.5% Lithuanian + 2.5% North_Swedish @ 12.84
7 100% Lithuanian + 0% Abhkasian @ 12.85
8 100% Lithuanian + 0% Adygei @ 12.85
9 100% Lithuanian + 0% Afghan_Pashtun @ 12.85
10 100% Lithuanian + 0% Afghan_Tadjik @ 12.85
11 100% Lithuanian + 0% Afghan_Turkmen @ 12.85
12 100% Lithuanian + 0% Aghan_Hazara @ 12.85
13 100% Lithuanian + 0% Algerian @ 12.85
14 100% Lithuanian + 0% Algerian_Jewish @ 12.85
15 100% Lithuanian + 0% Altaian @ 12.85
16 100% Lithuanian + 0% Armenian @ 12.85
17 100% Lithuanian + 0% Ashkenazi @ 12.85
18 100% Lithuanian + 0% Assyrian @ 12.85
19 100% Lithuanian + 0% Austrian @ 12.85
20 100% Lithuanian + 0% Austroasiatic_Ho @ 12.85

[artemv]

Just wanted to ask, what do you think all numbers mean?
After I read your brief text I thought you wanted to say that mesolithic population, that lived in modern Poland, and represented by individ, analyzed in Fernandes et al. 2018, contributed more genetic admixture to modern Poles, and neighboring Belarus got their WHG admixture from somewhat similar, but slightly different WHG population. Did I understand your point correctly?

I guess, the numbers you published only mean that modern Balts (first of all Estonians) have more WHG admixture than modern Polish people from Northen Poland, and North Polish have slightly more WHG admixture than Belarus. This could happen because Northern Polish have a little bit more Baltic ancestry than Belarus.

P.S. I agree that it is very interesting to understand which WHG populations contributed more to modern Europeans and which less. To understand that we need to compare different WHG populations and their affinity to modern Europeans, but not one WHG sample to multiple modern groups.