Maternal Y-DNA and Paternal mtDNA

[aaronbee2010]

The title is somewhat self-explanatory.

I think it would be a good idea to have optional sections for Maternal Y-DNA and Paternal mtDNA for ones AG profile. I've seen only a few others on AG go this far with testing, so it may make sense to have these as optional sections, that are hidden when unfilled (if that's possible?).

Looking forward to anyone's thoughts.

[DMXX]

Confirming that this has been implemented just now, with maternal and paternal uniparentals indicated through either an (M) or a (P), respectively.

We've also listed the uniparentals in alphabetical order (mtDNA M, mtDNA P, Y-DNA M, Y-DNA P). For those of us who've only tested ourselves (and are male), the only difference you'll currently note in your profile is the mtDNA and Y-DNA fields being flipped around.

Missing fields are automatically hidden, but that's the default display order.

Thanks for the suggestion, aaron.

[BMG]

Confirming that this has been implemented just now, with maternal and paternal uniparentals indicated through either an (M) or a (P), respectively.

We've also listed the uniparentals in alphabetical order (mtDNA M, mtDNA P, Y-DNA M, Y-DNA P). For those of us who've only tested ourselves (and are male), the only difference you'll currently note to your profile is the mtDNA and Y-DNA fields being flipped over.

Missing fields are automatically hidden, but that's the default display order.

Thanks for the suggestion, aaron.

I have updated mine but mtdna(M) and mtdna(P) is showing the same which is the data entered in mtdna(M) feild . Similarly ydna(P) and ydna(M) is showing the data of ydna(P)

[DMXX]

I have updated mine but mtdna(M) and mtdna(P) is showing the same which is the data entered in mtdna(M) feild . Similarly ydna(P) and ydna(M) is showing the data of ydna(P)

Ah, bugger. Correcting that now.

[Edit]: All fixed.

[Agamemnon]

I'd appreciate if it could be organised in the following manner:

Y-DNA (P)
mtDNA (M)
Y-DNA (M)
mtDNA (P)

[JMcB]

I'd appreciate if it could be organised in the following manner:

Y-DNA (P)
mtDNA (M)
Y-DNA (M)
mtDNA (P)

Yes, I’ll second that request and would also appreciate it!

[Agamemnon]

Yes, I’ll second that request and would also appreciate it!

Or alternatively:

Y-DNA (P)
mtDNA (P)
Y-DNA (M)
mtDNA (M)

[Ellerbe]

Or it could be:

Y-DNA
mtdNA
Y-DNA (M)
mtDNA (P)

^eyes could filter between main lines vs others with ease here.

[aaronbee2010]

I'd appreciate if it could be organised in the following manner:

Y-DNA (P)
mtDNA (M)
Y-DNA (M)
mtDNA (P)

I third this. Out of all of the suggestions I've seen, this one is my favourite.

[JMcB]

Or alternatively:

Y-DNA (P)
mtDNA (P)
Y-DNA (M)
mtDNA (M)

Also a possibility.

Although, I have to confess, no matter how they configure the (M) and the (P), I prefer the old ordering of:

Y-DNA
mtDNA