I’m not entirely sure how my ancestors results would look. I know their grandparents’ names, etc. but as a lot of names are generic Muslim ones so it’s hard to say what specific ethnicities they were marrying in to. I imagine they would score closer Central Asian as a simple matter of being less removed from our ancestors who migrated here, but in terms of WENA it’s hard to say since I’m not sure if Arabs or others from the Middle East really married into the family (as said before due to names being generic) outside of the few branches I know of for certain.
In terms of marriage, my ancestors seemed to marry either cousins or others of similar class i.e. "coworkers" in administrative positions in Delhi and the surrounding areas. I'm 100% sure there was mixing with locals, just by looking at my results and assuming my "foreign" ancestors would marry daughters of local converts, etc. Had there not been mixing with locals I think we would still see significant Turkic populations in the subcontinent. Take the Mughal emperors for example, they were initially Turkic but by the end of their reign they would be considered wholly Indian after centuries of intermixing.
Last edited by pakistani; 07-05-2020 at 07:51 PM.
MonkeyDLuffy (07-05-2020)
What interests me is beyond my Bukharan ancestor who is the furthest documented ancestor I've verified here, my family's shajras trace his ancestry to a Turkic Sufi saint Ahmad Yasawi, and further back to Mohammed ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib, both of which are most definitely not true.
Considering that my ancestor migrated to Delhi between 1296-1316 and died in 1338, meaning that he was definitely born after the Mongol conquest of Bukhara in 1220, and that his haplogroup was almost assuredly Q-L275, is it possible he was descended from Mongols? I haven't found much reading on the specific haplogroup: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_Q-L275 https://www.yfull.com/tree/Q-L275/