164226 (Kassabian) is so far one of the R-Z2105 (xL277, L584, Z2110), but with two SNPs from Geno 2.0 that link him to the Chinese NA18645 (CTS7763, CTS8966). This is his haplotype in YHRD format:
14 14 30 24 11 13 12 11,14 12 11 15 19 16 16 23 13 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
The closest to him in YHRD is this:
14 14 30 24 11 13 12 11,14 12 12 15 19 16 16 23 13 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
1 of 249 Çukurova, Turkey [Turk] Eurasian - Altaic Asia
with the modal 12 in DYS439.
There are two other close haplotypes to this:
14 13 29 24 11 13 12 11,14 12 12 15 19 16 16 23 13
1 of 386 Central Portugal, Portugal [Portuguese] Eurasian - European - Western European Europe
14 14 30 24 11 13 12 11,14 12 12 15 19 15 16 23 13
1 of 100 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil [African] African - Afro-American Latin America
These are two haplotypes at the limit of the range, because linked to them we go to the thick of the modal:

14 13 29 24 11 13 12 11,14 12 12 15 19 17 16 23 13 6
14 13 29 24 11 13 12 11,14 12 12 15 19 16 16 23 12 4
14 13 30 24 11 13 12 11,14 12 12 15 19 16 16 23 13 2
14 13 29 24 11 13 12 11,14 12 12 15 19 15 16 23 13 10
14 14 30 24 11 13 12 11,14 12 12 15 19 16 16 23 13 1
14 13 29 24 10 13 12 11,14 12 12 15 19 16 16 23 13 1
and
14 13 29 24 11 13 12 11,14 12 12 15 19 15 16 23 13 10
15 14 30 24 11 13 12 11,14 12 12 15 19 15 16 23 13 1
14 14 30 24 11 13 12 11,14 12 12 15 19 16 16 23 13 1
even though in the haplotype with a high value in YGATAH4=12 (13 in YHRD format).

This to say what? That the Armenian haplotypes are in the peryphery and not in the centre, which is clearly westwards. What have we to expect as to the link of these haplotype as to R-Z2105? That N53795 Karakashian is tested above all for L277, seen his values in DYS389=13-28 and in DYS392=14.
As to Kassabian I suppose that he has been put with NA18645 for his two SNPs in common with him even though he hasn't been tested for Z2106 but probably NA18645 has been tested for this SNP. Thus this Armenian one could be an Eastern European subclade of R-Z2106 whereas R-Z2109 could be an Asian subclade (NA20866) and R-Z2110 and subclades an European one.
Of course for having conclusions about the origin we need other data:
1) to know the origin of the Indian sample: is it ancient and diffused? is it due to Indo-Europeans or more recent Europeans? Is it important its DYS393=13 and not 12 and its AMH?
2) what about PF7580 as to L584?
3) what about L277?
4) what about the R-Z2105 (xL277, L584, Z2110)?