Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Group K): R-L2+ Z49 + Z142 + ......

  1. #1
    Registered Users
    Posts
    136
    Sex
    Location
    Bologna, Italia
    Nationality
    Italiana
    Y-DNA (P)
    R1b-L2+ZZ48+PF7600+
    mtDNA (M)
    H1e2

    Italy

    Group K): R-L2+ Z49 + Z142 + ......

    Yesterday Pigmon asked me if using the STR, I found groups belonging to R-L2+ Z49 + Z142 +.
    The answer is yes, I think I have found several (hand to hand that we will get the results from FGC and Big Y the job becomes easier).
    Now I propose one hoping to do something that is to your liking (let me know if I have to stop).

    The Group is K; the STR that identify it are the following:
    DYS459 = 9-9
    DYS437 = 14
    DYS448 = 18
    YCAII = 21-23

    This group consists of:
    a) Wilson (256287);
    b) Hebert (7735);
    c) Bergeron (218791);
    d) Ward (65315);
    e) Foakes (8642);
    f) Hill (6342);
    g) Hill (102977);


    This group is divided into 3 subgroups.

    The subgroup K.1) does not have a marker known with certainty (I mean the first STR that has developed).
    It consists only of:
    c) Bergeron (218791);


    The subgroup K.2) is identified by:
    DYS390 = 25
    DYS534 = 16

    And it is constituted by:
    a) Wilson (256287);
    b) Hebert (7735);


    The subgroup K.3) is identified by:
    DYS439 = 13 (Hill, 102977 has lost this marker in time)

    And it is constituted by:
    d) Ward (65315);
    e) Foakes (8642);
    f) Hill (6342);
    g) Hill (102977);


    The subgroup K.3) is then divided into 2 other subgroups

    The subgroup K.3.a) is identified by:
    DYS458 = 16

    And it is constituted by:
    e) Foakes (8642);
    f) Hill (6342);
    g) Hill (102977);

    The subgroup K.3.b) does not have a marker known with certainty (I mean the first STR that has developed).
    It consists of:
    d) Ward (65315);


    I think that the results that we have obtained from FCG and Big Y are important not only for their intrinsic value (the fact that we have obtained new groups using the new snp).
    I think there will be a much more important derived result as in the future we will be able to identify STR markers typical of each group. Through these STR markers we can analyze the database of the project R- U152 and expand the groups using the statistical science (STR markers).
    This work will be useful even for those who can not submit to the test or FGC Big Y cause shortage of funds. In fact, if they are included in these new groups, they will be able to perform only specific tests, much less expensive (I am referring for example to the Thomas Krahn‘s new company: http://shop.yseq.net/index.php ) .

    A final consideration (I refer in particular to my friend and compatriot Alessio Bedini): I am convinced that trying subgroups referring only to the number of differences between STR is absolutely wrong and misleading . The most effective method is to look for the STR markers that develop statistically on average every 4/5 snp (using the cover of FCG ).

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Acque agitate For This Useful Post:

     Bolgeris (04-15-2014),  Pigmon (04-15-2014),  Rathna (04-15-2014)

  3. #2
    Yes, this work is useful, and it will permit to verify my principles, that mutations happen around the modal, that there is a convergence to the modal as time passes, that sometime a mutation goes for the tangent and that only rarely there are multistep mutations.
    I was using these principles already from many years with my Italian friends Belgieri and Grassi who belong to your haplogroup.
    Big Y and Full Y will help.
    It seems to me demonstrated that also the used Mutation Rate of 0,0022 was wrong at least for a factor of 2.5 or even 3 or more.

    And this would explain also why Squecco is closer to the modal as to who belongs to a subclade of his like you posted on another thread, and the true origin of an haplogroup is open yet, if Squecco is an Italian, even though who believes to descend from some Celtic tribes.
    All these questions will be solved next in a meaning or in another.
    Last edited by Rathna; 04-15-2014 at 09:37 AM.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rathna For This Useful Post:

     Acque agitate (04-15-2014),  Pigmon (04-15-2014)

  5. #3
    Registered Users
    Posts
    136
    Sex
    Location
    Bologna, Italia
    Nationality
    Italiana
    Y-DNA (P)
    R1b-L2+ZZ48+PF7600+
    mtDNA (M)
    H1e2

    Italy
    Quote Originally Posted by Rathna View Post
    Yes, this work is useful, and it will permit to verify my principles, that mutations happen around the modal, that there is a convergence to the modal as time passes, that sometime a mutation goes for the tangent and that only rarely there are multistep mutations.
    I was using these principles already from many years with my Italian friends Belgieri and Grassi who belong to your haplogroup.
    Big Y and Full Y will help.
    It seems to me demonstrated that also the used Mutation Rate of 0,0022 was wrong at least for a factor of 2.5 or even 3 or more.

    And this would explain also why Squecco is closer to the modal as to who belongs to a subclade of his like you posted on another thread, and the true origin of an haplogroup is open yet, if Squecco is an Italian, even though who believes to descend from some Celtic tribes.
    All these questions will be solved next in a meaning or in another.
    Hello Rathna, your beliefs about the STR ​​are identical to mine.
    As for the other aspects (Italian origin of R-U152) I listen carefully to what you claim, but at the moment I can not share. I think most likely an external source.
    In any case, I admire your commitment and your great knowledge of the subject.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Acque agitate For This Useful Post:

     Pigmon (04-15-2014)

  7. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Acque agitate View Post
    Hello Rathna, your beliefs about the STR ​​are identical to mine.
    As for the other aspects (Italian origin of R-U152) I listen carefully to what you claim, but at the moment I can not share. I think most likely an external source.
    In any case, I admire your commitment and your great knowledge of the subject.
    Hello Acque Agitate (Trouble Waters for who don't understand Italian and as an old song said), I didn't said that I am sure that all U152 was born in Italy, I said that the question is open, and probably at least some subclades are, but we'll see about others. Anyway the times aren't more those thought till yesterday (by everybody but not by me): we are speaking of about 180 years for 1 SNP at the Big Y level, thus all the hypotheses done by others have crushed down.
    I am pretty sure about R1b1/L389+ (we don't know anything either from the subject nor from Richard Rocca about the Geno 2.0 of Mangino after more than three months!), R-M269*, R-L23*, R-L51* (see a thread on this where I think having given all the possible demonstrations).

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Rathna For This Useful Post:

     Pigmon (04-15-2014)

  9. #5
    Registered Users
    Posts
    136
    Sex
    Location
    Bologna, Italia
    Nationality
    Italiana
    Y-DNA (P)
    R1b-L2+ZZ48+PF7600+
    mtDNA (M)
    H1e2

    Italy
    Quote Originally Posted by Rathna View Post
    Hello Acque Agitate (Trouble Waters for who don't understand Italian and as an old song said), I didn't said that I am sure that all U152 was born in Italy, I said that the question is open, and probably at least some subclades are, but we'll see about others. Anyway the times aren't more those thought till yesterday (by everybody but not by me): we are speaking of about 180 years for 1 SNP at the Big Y level, thus all the hypotheses done by others have crushed down.
    I am pretty sure about R1b1/L389+ (we don't know anything either from the subject nor from Richard Rocca about the Geno 2.0 of Mangino after more than three months!), R-M269*, R-L23*, R-L51* (see a thread on this where I think having given all the possible demonstrations).
    Hello Rathna, by my calculations I became convinced that R-L2 has at least 5300 years. So I believe that we must take not less than 200 years for 1 snp (Cover Big Y or 100 years cover with FGC).
    There are also several historical evidence that confirms this hypothesis.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Acque agitate For This Useful Post:

     Pigmon (04-15-2014)

  11. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Acque agitate View Post
    Hello Rathna, by my calculations I became convinced that R-L2 has at least 5300 years.
    Probably much more. The Jewish cluster R-U152/L2/L69/L408/L409/L443 has 37 SNPs below L11*, thus 6660YBP (the test has been done on about the same percentage of the Y as to Big Y in the Rootsy et al. 2013). The separation from L23* may come back to 8640YBP.
    It is an unique haplotype, even though very differentiated from the others, and this demonstrates that many haplotypes survived by chance, whichever we want to think about their origin, i.e. whether due to an bottleneck or to an introgression from close haplotypes to discover yet.
    Last edited by Rathna; 04-15-2014 at 02:26 PM.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Rathna For This Useful Post:

     Pigmon (04-15-2014)

  13. #7
    Registered Users
    Posts
    159
    Sex
    Location
    Kentucky, USA
    Ethnicity
    French, English
    Nationality
    U.S.A.
    Y-DNA (P)
    U152,L2,Z49Z142,Z150

    Switzerland Italy Piemonte France England United States of America
    Acque agitate,

    Would it be safe to say that I would fit into the K.3 group with Ward (65315); Foakes (8642); Hill (6342); Hill (102977) because I have these markers or with K.3.a e) Foakes (8642); f) Hill (6342); g) Hill (102977); ?:

    My:
    DYS 439=13
    DYS 458 =16
    and
    DYS 459=9-10
    DYS 437=15

    DYS 448=19
    YCAII = 19-23
    also
    DYS 390=23
    DYS 534=15
    and
    DYS 458=16

    P.S. I just ordered through FTDNA test: Z12222(Z150).



    "The subgroup K.3) is identified by:
    DYS439 = 13 (Hill, 102977 has lost this marker in time)

    And it is constituted by:
    d) Ward (65315);
    e) Foakes (8642);
    f) Hill (6342);
    g) Hill (102977);


    The subgroup K.3) is then divided into 2 other subgroups

    The subgroup K.3.a) is identified by:
    DYS458 = 16

    And it is constituted by:
    e) Foakes (8642);
    f) Hill (6342);
    g) Hill (102977);

    The subgroup K.3.b) does not have a marker known with certainty (I mean the first STR that has developed).
    It consists of:
    d) Ward (65315);"
    Last edited by Pigmon; 04-15-2014 at 07:03 PM. Reason: typo, added some dys numbers
    Former cold war era "silent warrior" - the top 1/2 of the top 1 percent of the U.S. Air Force Hidden Content
    Hidden Content

    Current level of testing: R1b1a2a1a2b1c1 U152, L2, Z49, Z142 and Z12222/Z150*

    (BigY shows that a back mutation of PF214 make my closest Big Y matches Buffington, Smith, Lincoln and Mitchell)

  14. #8
    Registered Users
    Posts
    4,413
    Sex
    Location
    Tierra de Ayllon
    Y-DNA (P)
    U152>L2>Z49>Z142>
    mtDNA (M)
    H1bt
    Y-DNA (M)
    I2a2a1b2a1b1>Y4925
    mtDNA (P)
    H37

    England Scotland Wales Germany Ireland Sweden Finns
    Pigmon,

    I don't think you would be in any of these groups as you don't have the STRs common to all those in the group including Ward 65315 (He's on page 1 of the FTDNA U152 page).

    The Group is K; the STR that identify it are the following:
    DYS459 = 9-9, You are 9-10
    DYS437 = 14, You are 15
    DYS448 = 18 You are 19
    YCAII = 21-23 You are 19-23

    As an aside, looking at Rich's latest SNP tree it appears there may be some correlation between 390=25 and subclade L654 (under Z150), but it's too early to draw any conclusions.
    Y DNA line continued: Z142>Z12222>FGC12378>FGC12401>FGC12384
    35% English, 26% Scot/Ulster Scot, 14% Welsh, 14% German, 5% Ireland, 3% Nordic, 2% French/Dutch, 1% India
    Hidden Content

  15. #9
    Registered Users
    Posts
    3,992
    Sex
    Location
    USA
    Ethnicity
    Italo-Iberian
    Nationality
    American
    Y-DNA (P)
    R1b-U152+L2+FGC10543
    mtDNA (M)
    H4a1-T152C!

    United States of America Italy 1861-1946 Spain
    Quote Originally Posted by Rathna View Post
    Hello Acque Agitate (Trouble Waters for who don't understand Italian and as an old song said), I didn't said that I am sure that all U152 was born in Italy, I said that the question is open, and probably at least some subclades are, but we'll see about others. Anyway the times aren't more those thought till yesterday (by everybody but not by me): we are speaking of about 180 years for 1 SNP at the Big Y level, thus all the hypotheses done by others have crushed down.
    I am pretty sure about R1b1/L389+ (we don't know anything either from the subject nor from Richard Rocca about the Geno 2.0 of Mangino after more than three months!), R-M269*, R-L23*, R-L51* (see a thread on this where I think having given all the possible demonstrations).
    Not that this has anything to do with this topic, but his results are posted. On first view it looks like he is L388+L389+.
    Last edited by R.Rocca; 04-15-2014 at 11:05 PM.
    Paternal: R1b-U152 >> L2 >> FGC10543 >> PR5365, Pietro Rocca, b. 1559, Agira, Sicily, Italy
    Maternal: H4a1-T152C!, Maria Coto, b. ~1864, Galicia, Spain
    Mother's Paternal: J1+ FGC4745/FGC4766+ PF5019+, Gerardo Caprio, b. 1879, Caposele, Avellino, Campania, Italy
    Father's Maternal: T2b-C150T, Francisca Santa Cruz, b.1916, Garganchon, Burgos, Spain
    Paternal Great (x3) Grandfather: R1b-U106 >> L48 >> CTS2509, Filippo Ensabella, b.~1836, Agira, Sicily, Italy

  16. #10
    Registered Users
    Posts
    159
    Sex
    Location
    Kentucky, USA
    Ethnicity
    French, English
    Nationality
    U.S.A.
    Y-DNA (P)
    U152,L2,Z49Z142,Z150

    Switzerland Italy Piemonte France England United States of America
    Quote Originally Posted by MitchellSince1893 View Post
    Pigmon,

    I don't think you would be in any of these groups as you don't have the STRs common to all those in the group including Ward 65315 (He's on page 1 of the FTDNA U152 page).

    The Group is K; the STR that identify it are the following:
    DYS459 = 9-9, You are 9-10
    DYS437 = 14, You are 15
    DYS448 = 18 You are 19
    YCAII = 21-23 You are 19-23

    As an aside, looking at Rich's latest SNP tree it appears there may be some correlation between 390=25 and subclade L654 (under Z150), but it's too early to draw any conclusions.
    Good morning Mitchell,

    That was my point for posting. I don't fit group K but I do match with group K.3 and group K.3a

    Modal K.3 --- Pigmon --- Mitchell

    DYS 439=13 --- 13 --- 12


    Modal K.3a

    Dys 458=16 ---- 16 --- 19



    quote from Acque Agitate:

    "The subgroup K.3) is identified by:
    DYS439 = 13 (Hill, 102977 has lost this marker in time)

    And it is constituted by:
    d) Ward (65315);
    e) Foakes (8642);
    f) Hill (6342);
    g) Hill (102977);


    The subgroup K.3) is then divided into 2 other subgroups

    The subgroup K.3.a) is identified by:
    DYS458 = 16

    And it is constituted by:
    e) Foakes (8642);
    f) Hill (6342);
    g) Hill (102977);

    The subgroup K.3.b) does not have a marker known with certainty (I mean the first STR that has developed).
    It consists of:
    d) Ward (65315);"
    Last edited by Pigmon; 04-16-2014 at 11:33 AM.
    Former cold war era "silent warrior" - the top 1/2 of the top 1 percent of the U.S. Air Force Hidden Content
    Hidden Content

    Current level of testing: R1b1a2a1a2b1c1 U152, L2, Z49, Z142 and Z12222/Z150*

    (BigY shows that a back mutation of PF214 make my closest Big Y matches Buffington, Smith, Lincoln and Mitchell)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Branches of Z142
    By MitchellSince1893 in forum L2
    Replies: 380
    Last Post: 07-27-2021, 06:04 AM
  2. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-29-2017, 07:48 PM
  3. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 05-28-2016, 09:19 PM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-23-2015, 03:49 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-07-2015, 10:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •