Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 55

Thread: Ancient Egypt, Sudan, North Africa? Will there be any results from these areas?

  1. #11
    Registered Users
    Posts
    1,654
    Sex
    Y-DNA (P)
    C-F5481
    mtDNA (M)
    M8a

    Kyrgyzstan
    http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/18979/

    Morez, A (2023) Reconstructing past human genetic variation with ancient DNA: case studies from ancient Egypt and medieval Europe. Doctoral thesis, Liverpool John Moores University.

    Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 February 2025.

    Abstract

    Recent advances in palaeogenomics have massively improved our knowledge of human history. An explosion in the number of sequenced ancient human genomes has allowed direct exploration of ancestry dispersion, and processes of assimilation of these ancestries (e.g., admixture, replacement). Despite this, some regions and periods remain under-studied. In this thesis, DNA is recovered from populations yet to be characterized in order to use genomics to answer archaeological and anthropological questions.

    Despite the rapidly growing availability of ancient genomes from western Eurasia, the Picts of early medieval Scotland (ca. 300-900 CE) are under-represented among these genomes and remain poorly characterised. Chapter 2 describes the genetic relationship of the Picts with Iron Age, early medieval and present-day populations throughout Eurasia. Genome-wide data (0.1 – 16.5X coverage) were retrieved from four individuals representing two Pictish sites (5th-7th centuries CE), Balintore (Easter Ross, northern Pictland) and Lundin Links (Fife, southern Pictland), and mitochondrial genomes from seven individuals from a cemetery at Lundin Links. Using allele frequency-based methods (PCA, ADMIXTURE, f-statistics, qpAdm), their affinities to a reference panel of ancient and modern genomes were assessed. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplogroups were reconstructed to gain insight into social organisation at Lundin Links. Two Picts (BAL003 and LUN004) were genetically similar to north-western people dated from the Iron Age and early medieval period; the two remaining Picts (LUN001 and LUN003) showed admixture from a European source and a source related to present-day Native Americans, previously widely spread in eastern Eurasia, with uncertainties concerning the authenticity of this signal. At Lundin Links, the individuals did not share common maternal ancestors, consistent with high female exogamy at the site.

    Chapter 3 assess the fine-scale relationship of the Picts with western Europeans dated from the Iron Age onward. A new combined set of imputed ancient European genomes (n = 285, coverage 0.7-16X), including re-imputed diploid genomes dated to the Iron Age through medieval periods from Britain, Iceland, Scandinavia and central Europe, were used to analyse the Pictish genomes with several haplotype-based methods (identity-by-descent, ChromoPainter and FineSTRUCTURE). These high-resolution techniques allow for a refined assessment of the biological relatedness of the Picts to populations of north-western Europe. Overall, the Picts showed a greater relative genetic affinity with Iron Age populations from the British Isles than with ancient Europeans. In addition, the Picts are genetically similar to present-day Welsh, Northern Irish and Scottish populations. The data presented here highlight the advantages of using high-quality DNA sequences, coupled with new haplotype-based analytic tools, to disentangle complex and recent demographic history between ancient populations.

    Compared with Europe, palaeogenetics in Africa is poorly studied, in part because DNA degrades faster in tropical and dry environments. Chapter 4 aims to unveil population movements in Egypt and Sudan from the Neolithic onward. DNA was extracted from 94 samples from Armant (Egypt), Nuerat (Egypt) and Ghaba (Sudan) dated from the Early Neolithic to the historic period. Genome-wide data were successfully recovered from one sample from Nuerat sequenced to 0.22X coverage, dated to 2,868-2,492 cal BCE (95.4% probability) - consistent with the 3rd-4th Dynasties of the Old Kingdom. Allele frequency-based analyses (PCA, ADMIXTURE, f-statistics, qpAdm) show a strong genetic affinity of this sample to Levantine Natufians. Compared with genomes dated from the end of the Dynastic period (Third Intermediate Period) and present-day Egyptians, the Nuerat sample did not carry the Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer genetic component that started to spread across West Asia ~4,000 years ago and is widely spread in present-day populations. The presence of this component in Egypt is likely associated with admixture between local Egyptian populations and Bronze Age-related populations from West Asia. This admixture pattern might result from the dominance of Lower Egypt by Canaanite (Levantine) rulers during the Second Intermediate Period (ca. 1,650-1,550 BCE).

    Even though optimised wet-laboratory techniques improved retrieval of aDNA, it is still a challenging technique, with a higher proportion of failure than success, especially for samples from tropical and sub-tropical regions. Alternative methods are required. Tooth crown and root traits, like those in the Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System (ASUDAS), are seemingly useful as genetic proxies. Chapter 5 investigates whether such traits can approximate genetic relatedness in the absence of aDNA, among continental and global samples. For 12 African and 32 global populations, Mantel correlations were calculated between the mean measure of divergence (MMD) distances from up to 36 ASUDAS traits, and FST distances from >350,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among matched dental and genetic samples. A close ASUDAS/SNP association, based on MMD and FST correlations, is evident, with rm-values between 0.84 in Africa and 0.72 globally. Partial MMD/FST correlations controlling for geographic distances are strong for Africa (0.78) and moderate globally (0.4). Relative to prior studies, MMD/FST correlations imply greater dental and genetic correspondence. The implication is that ASUDAS traits can be used instead of genomic markers when the latter are unavailable.

  2. The Following 27 Users Say Thank You to rozenfeld For This Useful Post:

     Aben Aboo (03-18-2023),  Agamemnon (03-17-2023),  aganmu (03-17-2023),  Ariel90 (03-17-2023),  Bruzmi (03-16-2023),  Cabaon (03-16-2023),  Despina (03-25-2023),  drobbah (03-16-2023),  Gadzooks (03-19-2023),  JMcB (03-16-2023),  Lank (03-16-2023),  Mansamusa (03-24-2023),  Michalis Moriopoulos (03-16-2023),  Nebuchadnezzar II (03-17-2023),  nee4speed111 (03-16-2023),  Numidian (03-16-2023),  parasar (03-16-2023),  pgbk87 (03-17-2023),  Philjames (03-16-2023),  Qrts (03-16-2023),  RCO (03-16-2023),  Rez_Ezn (03-16-2023),  Ryukendo (03-16-2023),  Shuzam87 (03-17-2023),  theplayer (03-16-2023),  traject (03-17-2023),  VladimirTaraskin (03-16-2023)

  3. #12
    Registered Users
    Posts
    453
    Sex

    I take the opportunity to ask, are the Egyptians of Levantine origin or a population similar to Natufian ? I say this because although Egypt to the south, such an ancient people has had changes in its genome, I see that most of the ancient and modern samples (whether Copts, Muslims, etc.) are very close to the populations of the Levant

  4. #13
    Registered Users
    Posts
    321

    Quote Originally Posted by lorddraco14 View Post
    I take the opportunity to ask, are the Egyptians of Levantine origin or a population similar to Natufian ? I say this because although Egypt to the south, such an ancient people has had changes in its genome, I see that most of the ancient and modern samples (whether Copts, Muslims, etc.) are very close to the populations of the Levant
    The base of Egyptian ancestry is indeed similar to Natufian. And there can be no doubt that at least some of Egyptian ancestry originated from the post neolithic or even epipaleolithic Levant. The question is how much, and this question has not yet been fully resolved.

    I believe there are good reasons to think the bulk of Egyptian ancestry is indeed local to Northeast Africa, but there is still much uncertainty. Levantines themselves must also have substantial Northeast African ancestry, but given the millennia of interaction and movement between these regions, the full picture is still not quite clear.

  5. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Psynome For This Useful Post:

     Aben Aboo (03-18-2023),  drobbah (03-16-2023),  Gadzooks (03-19-2023),  pgbk87 (03-17-2023)

  6. #14
    Gold Class Member
    Posts
    2,492
    Sex
    Omitted
    Nationality
    Canadian
    aDNA Match (1st)
    KEN_Pastoral_N_Elmenteitan:I8805
    aDNA Match (2nd)
    KEN_Pastoral_N_Elmenteitan:I8922
    aDNA Match (3rd)
    KEN_Pastoral_N:I8918
    Y-DNA (P)
    E-V32>E-FT385910
    mtDNA (M)
    L0a1d1*
    Y-DNA (M)
    T-FGC92488
    mtDNA (P)
    L3d1a1

    Somaliland Yemen Ethiopia
    Quote Originally Posted by Psynome View Post
    The base of Egyptian ancestry is indeed similar to Natufian. And there can be no doubt that at least some of Egyptian ancestry originated from the post neolithic or even epipaleolithic Levant. The question is how much, and this question has not yet been fully resolved.

    I believe there are good reasons to think the bulk of Egyptian ancestry is indeed local to Northeast Africa, but there is still much uncertainty. Levantines themselves must also have substantial Northeast African ancestry, but given the millennia of interaction and movement between these regions, the full picture is still not quite clear.
    I think this NE African Natufian-like component is also what descendants of Cushitic pastoralists in the Horn & Sudan carry.
    Code:
    Target: Drobbah_FTDNA_scaled
    Distance: 2.0589% / 0.02058915
    92.6	Cushitic
    7.4	Arabian
    
    Target: Drobbah
    Distance: 1.8387% / 0.01838736
    63.6	Pastoral_N
    28.8	KEN_Pastoral_IA
    6.0	Levant_Tell_Qarassa_Early_Antiquity
    1.6	Levant_Megiddo_MLBA

  7. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to drobbah For This Useful Post:

     Aben Aboo (03-18-2023),  beyoku (03-17-2023),  pgbk87 (03-17-2023),  Psynome (03-16-2023),  Riverman (03-17-2023),  tikosg (03-22-2023)

  8. #15
    Registered Users
    Posts
    2,119
    Sex
    Location
    Central Florida
    Ethnicity
    Greek + Anglo-American
    Nationality
    American
    Y-DNA (P)
    J-PF5197
    mtDNA (M)
    J1b1a

    Greece United States of America
    Nice that the information on the Old Kingdom sample is finally out in the open. So yeah, it's what anyone would expect, and of course the shifts toward the CHG/Iran Neo rich profile later on are entirely predictable.

    As for the predynastic, there is still no word. I expect there won't be much difference between Badarians and the OK.

    Also note that the Nuerat site is in Upper Egypt.
    Last edited by Michalis Moriopoulos; 03-16-2023 at 06:46 PM.
    Ελευθερία ή θάνατος.

  9. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Michalis Moriopoulos For This Useful Post:

     Aben Aboo (03-18-2023),  Agamemnon (03-17-2023),  Bulletproofpride (03-17-2023),  drobbah (03-16-2023),  Gadzooks (03-19-2023),  Nebuchadnezzar II (Today),  pgbk87 (03-17-2023),  Psynome (03-16-2023),  Qrts (03-16-2023),  Riverman (03-17-2023),  Ryukendo (03-16-2023)

  10. #16
    Registered Users
    Posts
    3
    Sex

    Quote Originally Posted by Michalis Moriopoulos View Post
    Nice that the information on the Old Kingdom sample is finally out in the open. So yeah, it's what anyone would expect, and of course the shifts toward the CHG/Iran Neo rich profile later on are entirely predictable.

    As for the predynastic, there is still no word. I expect there won't be much difference between Badarians and the OK.

    Also note that the Nuerat site is in Upper Egypt.
    Hi,
    do you have any idea about the exact location of this site?
    it would be nice to have any info about it, as I couldn't find it anywhere.
    thanks!

  11. #17
    Registered Users
    Posts
    2,119
    Sex
    Location
    Central Florida
    Ethnicity
    Greek + Anglo-American
    Nationality
    American
    Y-DNA (P)
    J-PF5197
    mtDNA (M)
    J1b1a

    Greece United States of America
    Quote Originally Posted by Moabdou View Post
    Hi,
    do you have any idea about the exact location of this site?
    it would be nice to have any info about it, as I couldn't find it anywhere.
    thanks!
    https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/131164057.pdf

    Page 55 has a map featuring the site and page 66 has details about it.
    Ελευθερία ή θάνατος.

  12. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Michalis Moriopoulos For This Useful Post:

     Agamemnon (03-17-2023),  Bulletproofpride (03-17-2023),  Despina (03-25-2023),  Moabdou (03-16-2023),  Numidian (03-17-2023),  Psynome (03-16-2023),  Rez_Ezn (03-16-2023),  Riverman (03-17-2023),  Woozler (03-16-2023)

  13. #18
    Registered Users
    Posts
    3
    Sex

    Quote Originally Posted by Michalis Moriopoulos View Post
    https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/131164057.pdf

    Page 55 has a map featuring the site and page 66 has details about it.
    Thanks a lot.
    may I ask if you have any info about the new Morez, A Study, specifically the Neolithic samples?

  14. #19
    Registered Users
    Posts
    2,119
    Sex
    Location
    Central Florida
    Ethnicity
    Greek + Anglo-American
    Nationality
    American
    Y-DNA (P)
    J-PF5197
    mtDNA (M)
    J1b1a

    Greece United States of America
    Quote Originally Posted by Moabdou View Post
    Thanks a lot.
    may I ask if you have any info about the new Morez, A Study, specifically the Neolithic samples?
    Don't know, sorry.
    Ελευθερία ή θάνατος.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Michalis Moriopoulos For This Useful Post:

     Moabdou (03-16-2023)

  16. #20
    Registered Users
    Posts
    209
    Sex

    Quote Originally Posted by rozenfeld View Post
    http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/18979/

    Compared with genomes dated from the end of the Dynastic period (Third Intermediate Period) and present-day Egyptians, the Nuerat sample did not carry the Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer genetic component that started to spread across West Asia ~4,000 years ago and is widely spread in present-day populations. The presence of this component in Egypt is likely associated with admixture between local Egyptian populations and Bronze Age-related populations from West Asia. This admixture pattern might result from the dominance of Lower Egypt by Canaanite (Levantine) rulers during the Second Intermediate Period (ca. 1,650-1,550 BCE).
    Didn't the Nakht-Ankh sample from circa 1879 BC (from present-day Sudan) already contain substantial amounts of CHG/Iranian ancestry?

    How reliable is this?

    Egyptian_1879bc:Nakht-Ankh,0.0012,0.129,-0.044,-0.0965,-0.0031,-0.0534,-0.017,-0.0078,0.0551,-0.0049,0.0138,-0.0172,0.0306,-0.0015,0.0069,-0.0072,-0.0111,0.0053,-0.004,0.0042,-0.0012,0.0046,-0.0078,0.0026,-0.0013

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-09-2022, 03:28 PM
  2. Upcoming DNA studies in relation to Egypt & Sudan
    By nee4speed111 in forum Ancient (aDNA)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-31-2021, 08:11 PM
  3. Replies: 574
    Last Post: 12-21-2021, 01:22 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-01-2017, 07:27 PM
  5. Ancient Iberomaurusian mtDNA from North Africa
    By Callingstar in forum Ancient (aDNA)
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-08-2017, 04:49 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •