Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: I2a2 (I-M436): Germanic origin?

  1. #21
    Registered Users
    Posts
    333
    Sex

    Quote Originally Posted by artemv View Post
    but some specific branches can be Germanic.

    This means that those branches of I2 are Indo-european.
    Nope.

  2. #22
    Moderator
    Posts
    1,822
    Sex
    Location
    Viseu
    Ethnicity
    Romanised Paesuri
    Nationality
    Portuguese
    Y-DNA (P)
    E-Y31991 Y168273
    mtDNA (M)
    H20

    Asturias Portugal 1143 Portugal 1485 Portugal Order of Christ
    Quote Originally Posted by Rethel View Post
    Nope.
    Quality posting Rethel.


    He's right though, if a certain clade is generated within a Germanic-speaking group, labeling it "Germanic" is correct. Such as this one https://www.yfull.com/tree/I-A8674/
    YDNA - E-Y31991>PF4428>Y134097>Y168273 (Scythian/Sarmatian). Domingos Rodrigues, b. circa 1680 Hidden Content , Viana do Castelo, Portugal
    mtDNA - H20. Maria Josefa de Almeida, b. circa 1750 Hidden Content , Porto, Portugal

    Global25 PCA West Eurasia dataset Hidden Content
    Hidden Content

  3. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Ruderico For This Useful Post:

     aaronbee2010 (03-04-2019),  artemv (03-04-2019),  digital_noise (03-08-2019),  Michał (03-05-2019),  spruithean (03-05-2019)

  4. #23
    Registered Users
    Posts
    301
    Sex
    Location
    Haifa
    Ethnicity
    Jewish & Slavic
    Nationality
    Israel & Russia
    Y-DNA (P)
    I2a1b - S17250
    mtDNA (M)
    R0a4
    mtDNA (P)
    T2b5a

    Israel Israel Jerusalem Russian Federation Serbia Montenegro
    Quote Originally Posted by LePrieur View Post
    On my direct paternal I can trace back only to about the mid 1800s, and my ancestors were already colonial at that point. I know they are from the British Isles, but I can't say for sure what region.
    L223 has TRMCA of 2100 ybp and has a number of branches, most of them are from British Isles.
    There are also a few French and East European branches.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to artemv For This Useful Post:

     LePrieur (03-04-2019)

  6. #24
    Registered Users
    Posts
    333
    Sex

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruderico View Post
    He's right though, if a certain clade is generated within a Germanic-speaking group, labeling it "Germanic" is correct.
    Theoretically it seems like that, but in essence not, as it can lead to error.

    Of course, everything in germanic countries you can call germanic.

    Also Jews, Negros, Chineses, Poles, Pandas, Eskimoses, houses, forests, whatever - can be germanic, becasue is in germanic countries or among germanic people.

    And what?

    But the difference is, that among genetic topics, people are going to spread their own delusions and confuse adjectives with nouns, feature with essence.

    So much better is to make it clear what such and such haplotype describes as description it often taken for the meritum.
    Last edited by Rethel; 03-20-2019 at 09:00 PM.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. The Cimbri - Celtic or Germanic?
    By falconson1 in forum Western
    Replies: 146
    Last Post: 08-21-2019, 07:30 PM
  2. Replies: 360
    Last Post: 12-19-2015, 10:40 AM
  3. How did R1a subclades enter into Germanic cultures?
    By Mikewww in forum R1a General
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 07-29-2015, 01:28 PM
  4. ancient Central Germanic data
    By vettor in forum Ancient (aDNA)
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 10-05-2014, 02:29 AM
  5. Replies: 47
    Last Post: 09-28-2013, 05:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •